Marcel,
You can relax. I am not planning on shooting you or anyone else. I
am sorry you were so stricken by my statement. I should have been more
clear. I should not make idle statements that are so very terrifying.
I really hoped that for the most part readers could understand my
statement. I should have used the term abusive instead of
irresponsible.
I really don't have any use for a human life that would torture or
abuse a dog. I would like to see them shot. It would not hurt my
feelings in the slightest.


Be Free.....Judy

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:58:27 -0400, (Judith
Althouse) wrote:

Marcel,
You can relax. I am not planning on shooting you or anyone else.

I wouldn't count on that, Marcel! If you happen to spot an ugly old
hag wearing a "Che" t-shirt and a dirty black beret, you'd be wise to
shoot first and ask questions later.

Think of little Emilie, EH?

[...]
I really don't have any use for a human life that would torture or
abuse a dog. I would like to see them shot. It would not hurt my
feelings in the slightest.

Substitute the word "dog" there, Jude, with the word "child" or
"woman" or "man," and you'd be describing your "hero" Ernie "Che"
Guevara to a "T."

Freakin' maroon.

--
Handsome Jack Morrison

Don't mess with old farts!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286847,00.html

Free condoms for Mexico!
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=062807C

Immigration bill goes down in flames! Yip-ee-i-oh, yip-ee-i-ay!

Freakin' arrogant putas. spit

"Cloture Passes and I Re-assess My Patriotism"
http://shotsacrossthebow.com/archives/002724.html

Control-freaks from the "reality-based" community are at it again!
http://www.examiner.com/a-801194%7EG...alk_radio.html

Way to go, Vikings!
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/20...e-denmark.html

United States 2, Mexico 1
Too bad, muchachas putierrez! Better luck next time, putas!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/24/sp...&oref=sl ogin

Matt,
I know you can't see my face or hear my voice, however I am offering
an apology to you in all sincerity. I know it must be very difficult to
keep track of what I am making reference to since I don't copy the
complete post. I usually try to make reference to what I am commenting
on or referring to. I also change the subject a lot and ramble a lot.
I know that even though I am a relative new comer here I know almost
everyone's thoughts and idea on various subjects before I read them.
Anyway, that is unfair and wrong. I should not expect you or anyone else
to have to imagine what I am posting about. Ya know copying and
referring to partial posts is almost as troublesome to me as not
referencing the entire post as it often changes the whole point that was
originally intended, but sometimes that is the intention IMO. I
understand brevity and bandwidth is of importance as well.
I made an admittedly idle and errant statement indicating I would like
to see the irresponsible dog owner shot. I should have added versus the
dog. I should have also not used the term irresponsible I should have
said torturous and abusive dog owner versus irresponsible when I
indicated I would like to see the dog owner shot.
My understanding of your reply to my comment was if I did not recant
my statement you were going to stop reading my posts for awhile?
I took that as a little harsh for my idle statement that I just
assumed (wrongly) that everyone that reads my posts would know what I
mean.
The best I can offer to you is to try to do better at referring to
what I am commenting on and not make idle statements and expect you and
others to understand what I really mean.
I hope I am addressing your question.


Be Free.....Judy

To anyone that happens upon this post it has nothing to do wth the OP
or the thread.
Jack, you stated that Ernesto "Che" Guevara was guilty of killing men,
women, and children. I do not deny that is true. He was trying to
liberate Cuba from a dictatorship and later do the same in South
America. That is what happens in war. I would think that you and the
"brigade" would be up on that.
I am under the impression that innocents are killed every day in the
Middle East by our Military. Men, women, and cihildren are dying
because President Bush has chosen to liberate Iraqi's from the evil
dictatorship, and find the weapons of mass destruction, protect us from
terrorism, and find old what's his name?
No, I am not blaming our military. How are they to know who the enemy
is? We don't even know.
Do you get the connection? "War is Hell" It is just an expression,
but I think the people that are living it understand. Che believed in
what he was fighting for. Bush can't even claim that.
I can't figure it out, but I think I have it narrowed down.
No one else will pay any attention to you so you "rag" on me?
You are a closet Latino and ashamed to claim your heritage? Be proud.
You are a wannabe Cuban?
You are just a wannabe?
Peace and Love,
Your friend Jude


Be Free.....Judy

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:58:50 -0400, (Judith
Althouse) wrote:

Jack, you stated that Ernesto "Che" Guevara was guilty of killing men,
women, and children. I do not deny that is true.

He's not just guilty of killing men, women and children, he's guilty
of killing them in cold blood, and relishing each and every moment of
it.

He was trying to
liberate Cuba from a dictatorship and later do the same in South
America.

He wasn't trying to "liberate" anyone, he was following orders. And
although Batista was a dictator, his country was wealthy and
welcoming, and the people were free to come and go as they pleased.

That is what happens in war. I would think that you and the
"brigade" would be up on that.

The "brigade" is coming for you, Judy. Beware! Heh.

I am under the impression that innocents are killed every day in the
Middle East by our Military.

That you would compare what the US military is doing in Iraq, with the
blessing of the Iraqi people, to what Che did in Cuba and elsewhere,
is beyond the pale, but not surprising coming from some semi-literate
leftist bimbo like yourself.

Men, women, and cihildren are dying
because President Bush has chosen to liberate Iraqi's from the evil
dictatorship, and find the weapons of mass destruction, protect us from
terrorism, and find old what's his name?

Men, women and children are dying in Iraq because Al Qaeda is killing
them (like Che did, in cold blood), along with internecine warfare
taking its toll among the Sunni and Shia sects. They're a lot of
payback going on.

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/

No, I am not blaming our military. How are they to know who the enemy
is? We don't even know.

You don't know who the enemy is, after all these years?

sigh

The enemy is radical Islam, you freakin' bimbo.

Who do you think it is? The Mormons?

Do you get the connection? "War is Hell" It is just an expression,
but I think the people that are living it understand. Che believed in
what he was fighting for.

You are so incredibly stupid, if you really do believe that, that
you're basically off the charts.

Che ENJOYED killing people, particularly children, and particularly in
cold blood.

Had you actually read any of those cites I gave you previously, you'd
know that.

Bush can't even claim that.

Bush's decision to bring the fight to Al Qaeda, instead of just
sitting around and letting us get hit again, and again, and again,
like his predecessor did, is about the only thing he's done right
since taking office. And history will eventually prove that.

I can't figure it out,

That's because you're a bimbo.

No one else will pay any attention to you so you "rag" on me?

Did you forget that *you* started this ****?

How convenient.

You are a closet Latino and ashamed to claim your heritage? Be proud.

If I were a "Latino," I would indeed be proud of it. However, I'm an
*American* with Irish and Scottish ancestry, and extremely proud of
that.

I do, however, enjoy eating Latino food, and watching Latino ladies in
skimpy clothing dance the salsa!

Dios mio!

Heh.

--
Handsome Jack Morrison

Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny!
http://www.suntimes.com/news/othervi...REF30b.article

Yo, Judith! Watch this: "When your government becomes your doctor"
http://sickandsickermovie.com/

Jack,
I do glance at every thing you refer me to. I actually read every
word of some of the crap you send my way. Sometimes a few paragraphs or
a few grisly pictures is enough for me.
Why in the world do you think if it is something you have found to
support what you believe I am going to change my way of thinking? Give
it up. Che did not relish killing children. That is just ignorant, even
people that despise Che aren't fixated on him singling out children to
kill.
I have an upcoming appointment with a Neurosurgeon. I have received a
glossy brochure and paperwork preceding my appointment. The brochure
contains (among other things) photos of the staff and their education
and titles. Among them is a Dr Morales, he earned his medical degree at
the Superior Institute of Medical Science in Villa Clara, Cuba. He also
has a degree from other schools and it lists his internships and
specialties. Do you think my life is in danger if I wear my Che T
shirt? Maybe a slip of the knife? I hope I get a chance to speak to
him.
I pity you. What is our president going to do next? You do your best
to defend him while he is waging a senseless war. He has great timing.
He lets Scooter Libby off the hook during a holiday season. Despite the
fact that he has been found guilty. I guess the Prez thinks he will
slide it in while people are less likely to be watching TV or on the
internet etc.
I am really curious. Do you have a dog? Why don't you ever speak of
him? This is a dog forum. Don't you ever have the desire to slip in
one word about your dog in between the filth and lies? Everyone speaks
of off topic subjects from time to time, but I have never noticed you
making reference to owning a dog. What is up with that? I would love
to hear about your "best friend".
No more "Yo Judith" for me.....it is soooooo boring. Please go back
to sharing your wealth of knowledge with your many other friends.





Be Free.....Judy

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:01:51 -0400, (Judith
Althouse) wrote:

Jack,
I do glance at every thing you refer me to. I actually read every
word of some of the crap you send my way. Sometimes a few paragraphs or
a few grisly pictures is enough for me.

You've got a lot to make up for, Judith, so having your nose rubbed in
it is probably exactly what someone like you needs most.

And I don't send anything your way. I just provide you with a link to
it. Use them, or don't use them, it makes no difference to me.

They might even enlighten someone else who's previously bought in on
the Hollywood propaganda about Little Dirty Ernie.

Why in the world do you think if it is something you have found to
support what you believe I am going to change my way of thinking?

But I *don't* think that any of the information I provide you with is
going to change anything. Not at all.

There has to be some there, there, for that to ever happen, and there
obviously is no there, there.

Give it up.

Thanks, but I like to make my own rules!

Che did not relish killing children.

Yes, he did. And I even gave you proof of it. Including eyewitness
accounts.

Plus, he wouldn't have killed so many of them, including killing them
in front of their parents to boot, if he hadn't relished each moment.

Isn't it about time that you admitted to yourself that your idol was a
cold-blooded murderer of innocent human beings?

It must have been hard for the Germans to do that, but most of them
were finally able to come to grips with it. Maybe you'll follow in
their footsteps one day.

That is just ignorant, even
people that despise Che aren't fixated on him singling out children to
kill.

I'm not fixated on it either, but it's something that you should keep
in the forefront of your disturbing little mind, each time you look at
that disgusting poster on your wall.

I have an upcoming appointment with a Neurosurgeon.

That's somewhat surprising.

Don't you first need a brain before you can be in need of a
neurosurgeon? Or are you going to borrow someone else's?

I have received a
glossy brochure and paperwork preceding my appointment. The brochure
contains (among other things) photos of the staff and their education
and titles. Among them is a Dr Morales, he earned his medical degree at
the Superior Institute of Medical Science in Villa Clara, Cuba. He also
has a degree from other schools and it lists his internships and
specialties. Do you think my life is in danger if I wear my Che T
shirt? Maybe a slip of the knife? I hope I get a chance to speak to
him.

Why not wear it and see?

In fact, maybe you could look for a Jewish neurosurgeon, too.

That way, you see, you could finally get out that old Nazi uniform you
keep hidden in your bedroom closet and wear it to his office, too.

I pity you.

I'm not the one with a poster of a cold-blooded murderer on my wall,
Judith.

What is our president going to do next? You do your best
to defend him while he is waging a senseless war.

It's about the only thing I can defend him for, because it's a war
that *has* to be fought. Now. Not tomorrow. Tomorrow is too late.

He has great timing.
He lets Scooter Libby off the hook during a holiday season.

Scooter Libby should never have been on the hook in the first place.
First, there were no laws broken regarding revealing the identity of a
covert agent, because Plame wasn't a covert agent at the time. Second,
they already knew that Richard Armitage was the leaker. Poor ol' Libby
just got caught in the political crossfire. The people who actually
belong in jail are Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson, who also lied to
federal agents. And to Congress.

But it does prove that it *never* pays to talk to federal agents or
Congressmen, and why we have the Fifth Amendment in the first place.

I can't remember everything I did or said last week, much less months
or years ago. Why should Libby go to jail because he couldn't either?

Sandy Berger actually *stole* secret documents from the National
Archives, and he didn't go to jail. Why should Libby?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/...ger.sentenced/

Despite the fact that he has been found guilty. I guess the Prez thinks he will
slide it in while people are less likely to be watching TV or on the
internet etc.

That's funny. Because it seems that no one has been talking about
anything else these past few days. Somehow even someone as stupid and
ill-informed as you are managed to hear about it, eh?

I am really curious. Do you have a dog? Why don't you ever speak of
him? This is a dog forum.

I have *lots* of dogs, Judith. I *breed* dogs. I have dogs coming
out of my ass, in fact. And horses, too.

But the name of this newsgroup isn't rec.pets.dogs.talkaboutyourdogs.

It's rec.pets.dogs.BEHAVIOR. And about 1 in 50 posts these days might
actually have something to do with dog behavior.

It wasn't always like that here.

Don't you ever have the desire to slip in
one word about your dog in between the filth and lies?

What filth? What lies?

I can't help it if, in the immortal words of Colonel Jessep "you can't
handle the truth!"

Everyone speaks
of off topic subjects from time to time, but I have never noticed you
making reference to owning a dog. What is up with that? I would love
to hear about your "best friend".

Again, the name of the group isn't rec.pets.dogs.talkaboutyourdogs.

And although I have specifically referenced some of my dogs in the
past, back when the atmosphere was much friendlier than it is these
days, I just don't do it anymore. That's what one usually does with
friends.

And if you don't like, tough ****.

No more "Yo Judith" for me.....it is soooooo boring.

You know what's boring to me, Judith? Listening to people who I can
barely stand to be in the same room with, talk about what their little
Foo Foo did today.

sigh


--
Handsome Jack Morrison

"The car bomb you are calling may be switched off - please try again later!"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv..._author_id=322

"We're the government and we're here to help"...kill you.
http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=6177

Health ca We'd all love to see the plan.
http://www.janegalt.net/archives/009873.html

Don't mess with old farts! Part VI:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...019237681.html

Don't mess with old farts! Part VII:
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news...earlog_070621/

"No legislation without explanation!"
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister...le_1749152.php

Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny!
http://www.suntimes.com/news/othervi...REF30b.article

Yo, Judith! Watch this: "When your government becomes your doctor"
http://sickandsickermovie.com/