View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 08, 02:38 AM posted to rec.pets.dogs.behavior
Handsome Jack Morrison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,772
Default Adventures in Proofing Pt 2

On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:44:51 -0600, FurPaw
wrote:

Handsome "Jack" Morrison wrote:

First, rock-solid recalls (and the immediate and correct response to
commands) are directly related to how much time and effort a dog's
owner is willing to devote to training, including training with
distractions. And how often everything is reinforced.

And second, how effective the training techniques employed are.


What techniques do you use?


I'm a traditional trainer (training collar and leash), and I use the
e-collar, too.

In other words, I'm a "dog-abusing thug".

It's really not a matter of the dog's age.


To some extent it must be, no?


A dog as young as a few months can have a reasonably reliable recall.

Do you expect a rock solid recall
(with the best of techniques) in a 3 month old dog?


Rock-solid, no. Strong, yes.

What's the
youngest age a dog you've trained has achieved a rock-solid
recall?


6 months.

And at what age did you begin the training?


Formal training starts at 7 weeks. Informal training starts even
earlier than that.

Most dog owners make it much more difficult than it has to be. They do
silly things like chase after their puppy, they pick him up and take
him inside when he comes, they repeat commands ad nauseam, etc.

It's the most important command that a dog will ever learn, it's
relatively easy to teach, yet few dogs will ever have a rock-solid
recall.


--
Handsome "Jack" Morrison

Hate paying $5 for a gallon of gas? You can thank Al "The Goracle" Gore. spit
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemans.../19842304.html

At the Official Obama Site: 'How the Jewish Lobby Works'
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/arti...sh_Lobby_Works

"Global warming", solved!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...developed.html

So-called "green" taxes are a con. They have absolutely nothing to do with
saving the planet, or changing people's behaviour. It is all about raising
revenue. Governments around the world have realised that environmentalism
gives them an easy way of squeezing yet more tax out of hard-working people.
And if you object, you are supposed to feel guilty about drowning polar bears.
"Green" taxes also impact most heavily on the poor. This isn't an accident,
it is a deliberate policy.--Bill Carmichael, Yorkshire Post, 31 May 2008

Saudi Montana.
http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber...saudi-montana/

Skipping science class.
http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5820.html

So much for "settled science".
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/wor...html?id=525590

The top ten list of things environmentalists need to learn.
http://depletedcranium.com/?p=368

New Jason Satellite Indicates 23-Year Global Cooling.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2871

Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...6-7583,00.html

A book that every American should read (and NYT #1 bestseller): Liberal Fascism, by Jonah Goldberg
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascis.../dp/0385511841