![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
As part of a discussion on Harlequin color pattern and the ability of breeds other than Danes to produce it, this link popped up. Very interesting, to say the least: http://xoomer.alice.it/matesser/spott.htm Since the same breeder also appears to have produced yet another pup with similar markings, I'm thinking there is something strange in the lines they're using: http://xoomer.alice.it/matesser/nuovarri.htm Suja |
|
|||
|
"Suja" wrote in
: As part of a discussion on Harlequin color pattern and the ability of breeds other than Danes to produce it, What did you find in your discussion about that? Collie-type breeds like Collie, Sheltie and Australian Shepherd have this "tweed" pattern, a verion of merle which could be identical to harlequin. http://xoomer.alice.it/matesser/spott.htm Since the same breeder also appears to have produced yet another pup with similar markings, I'm thinking there is something strange in the lines they're using: http://xoomer.alice.it/matesser/nuovarri.htm I've seen that first link before, but not the second. This is not the "harlequin thing", and this is not piebald (color + white) either. This kind of irregular eumelanin/phaeomelanin patching is sometimes seen in dogs which are genetically ee recessive yellows. Well, it is actually so common that about every ee dog has at least one dark hair somewhere, but bigger, clearly visible dark spots are rare and this kind of pattern seen in the links is super rare. The best explanation I've heard for this: In these cases a dog is genetically ee, but in some cells one of those e alleles has for some reason mutated back to E during embryo development, and so the "real pattern" is partially visible. As Labradors are solid darks (blacks or browns, genetically dominant blacks), these dark patches on them are always black or brown. Other breeds might show other colors in these dark patches. Like one Westie pup I saw years ago: its weird belly spot had been jet black when it was born, but was quickly turning grizzled grey at the age of 4 weeks - showing that Westies might have G type greying if they weren't solid white! Another explanation is chimaera, a combination of two embryos. So parts of the dog belong to one individual, other parts belong to the other and these parts have at least slightly different genes - including color. This condition can't be duplicated, it is not inheritable. These pups just born when you least expect! Most of these dogs are sold to pet homes and not used for breeding, and the ones which smaller spots which have been bred have done it like any normal ee dogs, as far as I know. Here's a bad photo of a Rumanian stray dog which is ee yellow but has a small dark spot on shoulder: http://www.kolumbus.fi/sarakontu/colors/romlaikku.jpg This apricot Poodle (genetically ee) has also a spot on shoulder: http://www.kolumbus.fi/sarakontu/koi...lliseelaik.jpg Its spot was jet black when it was born, but has diluted into some kind of dirty grey. The dog is a show dog anyway, and its owner told that most judges don't pay attention to such a minor color fault. Liisa |
|
|||
|
"Liisa Sarakontu" wrote in message: What did you find in your discussion about that? It was in the context of finding Dachshunds advertised as being Harlequin. I think the general consensus was that in Dachshunds at least, it might be double dapples being passed off as Harlequin, and that in Min-Pins (another breed where Harlequin has existed, historically), it has been bred out. This condition can't be duplicated, it is not inheritable. I wish I knew enough Italian to figure out if the second pup was out of the same sire or dam or had some relation to the first. If that trait is not inheritable, and this sort of prominent marking is exceedingly uncommon, wouldn't this be a case of lightening striking twice? Suja |
|
|||
|
"Suja" wrote in
: It was in the context of finding Dachshunds advertised as being Harlequin. I think the general consensus was that in Dachshunds at least, it might be double dapples being passed off as Harlequin, Yes, homozygous merles could sometimes look like harlequins. that in Min-Pins (another breed where Harlequin has existed, historically), it has been bred out. Actually Min Pins (as we know the breed) never had harl or merle. It was a separate breed, Harlequin Pinscher, but it was most likely rather closely related to German Pinscher and Mini Pinscher, its size was about halfway between these two. Probably WWII killed the breed (like it nearly wiped out German Pinsher). Harlequin Pinscher was accepted by FCI only after it has gone nearly extinct (after WWII, I think), and it was removed from the FCI breed list (early 1960's?) after there had been no registrations for a certain time. Probably the only breed which has managed to get an FCI status and go extinct. I wish I knew enough Italian to figure out if the second pup was out of the same sire or dam or had some relation to the first. My Italian is good enough to order a pizza and wine, and that's about it! But luckily there are dictionaries. The first weird patterned Lab, Spot is from "Fred" and "Olga", their own dogs. The other most likely isn't. Its pedigree isn't shown, but that text there means something like "Links to the sites of dam and sire". Stallone means stud, and fattrice means broodmare (and most likely brood bitch too). Fred and Olga don't seem to be from those two kennels, so I guess that the second pup isn't related. Liisa |