In article ,
chardonnay9 wrote:
If all you can accomplish is calling names I guess it means you can't
refute what I say. I provide proof of what I say.

You're consistently incorrect on your facts and the very few
claims you've made about nutrition have been wrong. As
nearly as I can tell you don't even have an interest in
nutrition, which I guess would go a long way towards
explaining why you don't know about it. But nutritional
content is as or possibly more important than ingredients.
Ingredients matter but if you're not giving your dog
adequate nutrition you're hurting him.

Try having an open mind just once. I did when the kibble was killing
dogs. I saw the difference in my dogs in just three days. Increased
energy levels, shiny coat, happier dogs!

If you were buying your kibble at the grocery store then you
were buying crap and you don't have to improve the diet much
to see some improvement. Increasing the fat content is
going to make the coat look better regardless of whether or
not the dog is otherwise receiving adequate nutrition.

I really haven't seen you give any reason to believe that
you've got knowledge of or interest in *nutrition*. You
come off like a cultist, not a scientist.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community