FurPaw wrote:
Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Tara Green wrote:


Once again, she was pointing out that your lack of clarity in your
writing (especially when giving advice to folks with sick dogs) can
lead to some bad misinterpretations.

More like intentional misinterpretations.

In that case, given that she does indeed know better than to take what
you're saying at face value, yes. For the purpose of an example, it
was obvious to everyone (except you perhaps) that was intentional.

Someone who doesn't know better might well have misinterpreted
innocently. That was the point.

Yup. It's generally unwise to assume that you know precisely what a
writer intends when the writing is vague and overly general.


I suggested that meat with fat on it would be a better way of increasing
weight, especially on a diabetic dog that would be hurt by carbs more
than your average dog.

Tara keeps suggesting that this dog will die if it eats a chicken leg
quarter.

I don't see anything vague about it. It's just more mumbo jumbo from the
idiots who think I will leave if constantly attacked, just like most
people do who come here.

I'm not going anywhere. Get a hobby other than one that consists on
sitting in front of a computer being nasty to people. Better yet, get a
life. I'm not going anywhere.

Char