chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
chardonnay9 wrote:
I'm sure she'd be please to know what you think of her. I just don't
know why you think she and I would care if you personally pay
attention to her.

It seems pretty clear to me that if you're citing her as an
authoritative source in response to something I posted, you
care a very great deal. Why you're citing a random crank as
an authoritative source is left as an exercise, etc.

To something *you* posted? I started the thread and I post to inform
those who read here and rarely or never post because of vicious people
like you.

Random crank?

"British Author Wins Prestigious American Writing Award

In Search of the Truth About Dogs, a DVD written by Catherine
O’Driscoll, has received the prestigious Award of Best DVD of 2008 by
the Dog Writers’ Association of America. Catherine will receive a
Maxwell – the Oscar of the dog world. in_search_of_the_truth_about_dogs

Why don't you go look up some of the other
folks who have won that ward....numerous times.

Just because that award was given, doesn't
mean they are right, doesn't mean they are
good at what they do, and doesn;t even mean
that they are humane. Good idea to do your
homework before spewing this kind of thing as
proof of....well anything at all.



BTW, NY Times columnist Nick Kristof had an opinion piece on
hunger in Africa in this morning's paper. He claims:

Yet one of the great Western misconceptions is that
severe malnutrition is simply about not getting enough
to eat. Often it's about not getting the micronutrients
right -- iron, zinc, vitamin A, iodine -- and one of the
most cost-effective ways outsiders can combat poverty is
to fight this hidden hunger.


That is exactly why I feed raw and not crap in a bag.

Yeah....except that you have admitted you
don;t check any aspect of their nutrient
intake. You just assume that they're getting
all the macronutrients that they need as long
as you plop down some meat and bones in front
of them. Rookie mistake.