chardonnay9 wrote:
Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
chardonnay9 wrote:
Why do you make stuff up like that?

It's not "made up" - it's what you'e posted. You've said
that as long as you feed raw the dog's nutritional needs
will be met.

Nope, I didn't say that so that's a lie.

She was a bit off, but she was close.

You DID say that as long as you stick to the 80-10-10 model and feed
it raw, your dog's nutritional needs will be met.

That's not made up. YOU SAID THAT.

You've also failed to provide any specifics
about nutrition in any of your posts. For a very recent
example, when you recommended a high-fat diet for a dog the
owner said is thin, you didn't say what percentage of the
diet the fat should constitute,

I gave examples

That's a lie. You made a suggestion that he feed those things. Then
you gave examples of what he should feed.

which is no different and easier for the newbies to understand so
that's a lie.

No, its not a lie at all. You've been lying ever since in order to
backpedal what you did.

I see you still have to make stuff up.

Nope. You give so much ammo from being careless and irresponsible that
the only "making things up" happens when you realize what you've just
done and then you try to pretend it didn;t happen.

Archives don't llie....and yet you've lied in a post *with the very
quotes from you in it*

That takes a special kind of denial.

Quit making stuff up!

The only one here doing that is....


*you*