On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:13:40 -0500, "cshenk" wrote:

"sighthounds & siberians" wrote
Char wrote:

you seem to get most the details wrong. Eventually you will learn
though. Even stupid people are capable of learning.

At least I can write a coherent sentence, which you can't. I have no
desire to "present a truly serious debate" about feeding raw, because
I have no interest in feeding raw. Luckly, when debating with you,
that's not necessary. You wrote the book on elementary, not to
mention inaccurate, arguments, so it's not at all difficult to refute
them.

I am a little upset but a newbie here. The reason why I am upset is if you
track my inception to this area and this thread, it seemed to me an
inacceptance of anyone whom english was not the primary language. It wasnt
your part, but Char's.

Daniel is working well in english and if his grammer is still something he's
polishing up, it's nothing any native speaker cant figure out.

My apologies if I am both a newbie and asking a group to shift a bit. I do
ask we do the best at those who try english to make it work. I share the
mono-lingual trait so many USA folks have when it comes to more than basics
and thise alternative languages, I can't spell very well.

'Konnichiwa'! Domo arigato Gozaimas 'for listening' (Semnatic but not
literal: Hi there and thank you)

I don't think anyone has criticized Daniel's English usage, grammar or
anything else. Or yours. My comment to Char has nothing to do with
lack of acceptance of people whose native language is not English. I
am not quite sure what you're talking about.