![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
tiny dancer wrote:
Our's are also. No matter how long a time they have been gone. the contract signed says 'they must be returned to us if for any reason they are no longer wanted at their adoptive homes.' They have all been micro-chipped and neutered. Yes!!!! That is definitely the way to do it. I am a BIG fan of having puppies chipped before they leave their breeders, and wish that both AKC and animal control authorities required it *sigh*. Here's an incident that happened to one of my rescue buddies. She got a dog back after he ended up in a shelter becauses they were able to trace his microchip back to her - and boy, was she EVER pissed. I knew how carefully she screened her homes (actually the way I'd met her was that I'd adopted from her) and she used a contract requiring return of the dog if the owners could not keep it for any reason. So she hunted down the people who had adopted the dog from her and wanted to know what had happened. It turned out that they'd decided after a while that they didn't want to keep the dog after all and gave him to some friends (in violation of the contract, of course). The friends also got bored with him fairly quickly and ended up just letting him run loose. They didn't even bother checking the shelter when he failed to return home. So that microchip ended up saving that dog's bacon. No matter how good potential homes seem, and how many promises they make, you can never be 100% sure they'll follow through later on down the road :-(. Dianne |
|
|||
|
"Julia Altshuler" wrote in message . .. I'll admit to deleting without reading a lot of the "over protective dog" thread. It got boring with people repeating themselves a while ago. So I apologize if this subject has been brought up. Here's my question: What now? I think the cabal is pretty much in agreement that Peter shouldn't have bred Gretchen, that if he was going to breed her he should have known a lot more about breeding and Danes and should have gotten a number of tests done. That's in the past. Is there any concensus on what would be the best thing to do now? Peter, how far along is she? When are the puppies due? How is she acting during the pregnancy? How's her health? Cabal, what's the collective wisdom on spaying a bitch during pregnancy? Are there risks? Is there anything that might turn an earlier bad decision into a present not-as-bad situation? (I know it's useless to try to direct where a conversation goes ahead of time, but I'm going to do it anyway. Could we PLEASE keep away from the human abortion issue and keep to talking about dogs? Deep breath, a dog is not a person; a puppy is not a baby.) I think the best thing to do is find the best homes, and make sure that their contract states that they go back to Peter should anything go wrong. Peter should work with the puppy owners to ensure they get what they need to become happy, healthy adults. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| puppies-day 20 | Paula | Dog behavior | 0 | December 25th 06 05:03 AM |
| Puppies, puppies, adorable puppies | flick | Dog rescue | 0 | October 29th 03 01:07 PM |
| Puppies, puppies, adorable puppies | flick | Dog rescue | 0 | October 29th 03 01:07 PM |
| Puppies, puppies, adorable puppies | flick | Dog rescue | 0 | October 29th 03 01:07 PM |
| Puppies... :-( | Katra | Dog behavior | 0 | September 26th 03 08:42 AM |