As I move forward with training my dog. I would love to see how you
train your dogs from destructive chewing and OBSESSIVE Barking!

I did some research and have implemented 6 "Ways to Prevent
Destructive Chewing" and another article on "7 Reasons for Barking
Dogs" If you are interested, please check out my personal blog:
http://dogobedience101.blogspot.com

LivingWell wrote:
As I move forward with training my dog. I would love to see how you
train your dogs from destructive chewing and OBSESSIVE Barking!

I did some research and

you found a pay-per-click scam on the interwebs and thought you'd
give it a try.

--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)

On Mar 25, 10:21*am, Shelly wrote:
LivingWell wrote:
As I move forward with training my dog. *I would love to see how you
train your dogs from destructive chewing and OBSESSIVE Barking!

I did some research and

you found a pay-per-click scam on the interwebs and thought you'd
give it a try.

--
Shellyhttp://www.cat-sidh.net(the Mother Ship)http://esther.cat-sidh.net(Letters to Esther)

What in the world are you talking about? My blog and the links that I
provide as a reference are not Pay-Per-Click. If you look at the
******* Ads(Supported by Google), yes there is a mesley(sp.) 2 cents
to 25 cents per click. Big deal. Do click on Google Advertising
then. Any smart Blogger would integrate Google ******* just to pay
for the time and efforts put in to the blog. Trust me-- you won't get
rich from ******* unless you have 50+ Sites going at the same time.

Let's all stay on the topic of our affectionate and special dogs.

LivingWell wrote:

What in the world are you talking about? My blog and the links that I
provide as a reference are not Pay-Per-Click. If you look at the
******* Ads(Supported by Google),

No, I won't. I have no intention of increasing your hit count.

yes there is a mesley(sp.) 2 cents to 25 cents per click. Big deal.

It certainly can be.

Do click on Google Advertising
then. Any smart Blogger would integrate Google ******* just to pay
for the time and efforts put in to the blog.

I guess I'm dumb, then. I don't want to subject my friends and
relations to advertising. But, then, my blog is not a money making
venture.

--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)

LivingWell wrote:
As I move forward with training my dog. I would love to see how you
train your dogs from destructive chewing and OBSESSIVE Barking!

I did some research

But you failed to cite your sources, effectively claiming
the ideas as your own. Some folks call that plagiarism.

and have implemented 6 "Ways to Prevent
Destructive Chewing" and another article on "7 Reasons for Barking
Dogs" If you are interested, please check out my personal blog:
http://payme-whenyou-click.blogspot.com

So your links to As Seen on TV, sit-stay-fetch and others
embedded within your blog don't earn you any money? When
the urls take you to clickbank.net? Puh-leeze!

If you really want to see how 'we' train our dogs, you could
try reading this newsgroup for a while.

FurPaw
--
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched,
every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense
a theft from those who hunger and are not fed,
those who are cold and are not clothed."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

To reply, unleash the dogs.

LivingWell wrote in news:4bce021b-431d-484d-a893-
:

As I move forward with training my dog. I would love to see how you
train your dogs from destructive chewing and OBSESSIVE Barking!

I know you have a blog. Do you have a dog? It's spelled somewhat
similarly, but is an entirely different animal.

I did some research

Not enough, apparently.

--
Mary & the depleted Ames National Zoo
(Ranger, Duke, Rhia-cat)

In article ,
LivingWell wrote:
My blog and the links that I
provide as a reference are not Pay-Per-Click. If you look at the
******* Ads(Supported by Google), yes there is a mesley(sp.) 2 cents
to 25 cents per click.

I'm going with "stupid."
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Melinda Shore wrote:

I'm going with "stupid."

I'm thinking "asshole" might be more correct, though it obviously
doesn't preclude "stupid."

--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)

In article ,
FurPaw wrote:
But you failed to cite your sources, effectively claiming
the ideas as your own. Some folks call that plagiarism.

No, he paid for it. That is to say, he paid for the *text*.
There's no original content, and apparently he didn't stop
to consider how many other people are doing precisely what
he's doing with precisely the same material and advertising
it in precisely the same way.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Melinda Shore wrote:

apparently he didn't stop
to consider how many other people are doing precisely what
he's doing with precisely the same material and advertising
it in precisely the same way.

Oopsie! So much for all that research he supposedly did.

--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)