![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Shelly wrote:
More to the point, why would anyone want to put themselves in the position of offering advice to Paul, then being stalked and blamed for the next umpteen years when Paul screws it up? In my case, it's because I get a certain perverse joy in needling some people. I get more perverse joy if I do it in the most inoccuous ways, just little jabs such that the needleee has to twist into pretzels to find fault with me. --Lia |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Julia Altshuler wrote: I get more perverse joy if I do it in the most inoccuous ways, You misspelled the misspelling of "passive-aggressive." -- Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community |
|
|||
|
"Julia Altshuler" wrote in message . .. Shelly wrote: More to the point, why would anyone want to put themselves in the position of offering advice to Paul, then being stalked and blamed for the next umpteen years when Paul screws it up? In my case, it's because I get a certain perverse joy in needling some people. I get more perverse joy if I do it in the most inoccuous ways, just little jabs such that the needleee has to twist into pretzels to find fault with me. Just as I find humor and entertainment by pushing buttons and seeing a flurry of activity as a result. I don't get any positive comments when I just post something of interest, so it is more fun to post something controversial. But I keep it factual, and I will respond when someone makes a false statement. If someone has paranoid delusions about being stalked, then that is their problem and they should seek professional help. Now, let's see if the RPDB revisionists and malcontents will take the bait and make a tweener. Paul and Muttley |
|
|||
|
Melinda Shore wrote:
You misspelled the misspelling of "passive-aggressive." Ah, but how do we tell the difference between helpful friendly suggestions that are meant to be helpful and friendly, and helpful friendly suggestions that are meant to needle? I'm not always needling, not even usually. But sometimes I run into people who see needles everywhere, so they see passive aggressiveness everywhere. It's kind of fun when I find those. --Lia |
|
|||
|
"Paul E. Schoen" wrote: He would probably be OK off-leash, I see nothing in your post that would lead to this conclusion. The fact that he didn't go into the road or take off into the woods *this* time is no guarantee that he won't next time. I just can't take that chance. We were probably very lucky on this adventure. I don't think there's any "probably" about it, given the speed people hit on Warren Road, and the fact that he still has no recall. I already know that I should have had him on a harness, rather than a choker chain in non-choke mode. Why a harness? For tethering while you're out with him, IMO your best bet would be a martingale aka "combo" collar; Petsmart sells them cheaply, and the shop next to Falls Road Animal hospital carries (or used to carry) Lupines, which aren't cheap but last forever (and have a lifetime guarantee, to boot). Most professional or commercial dog walkers insist on them for client dogs, because if they're adjusted properly, they're damn near escape-proof but can't choke the dog, and are comfortable otherwise. Not to mention easy to take on and off, since they just slip over the dog's head. |
|
|||
|
"sionnach" wrote in message ... "Paul E. Schoen" wrote: He would probably be OK off-leash, I see nothing in your post that would lead to this conclusion. The fact that he didn't go into the road or take off into the woods *this* time is no guarantee that he won't next time. I just can't take that chance. We were probably very lucky on this adventure. I don't think there's any "probably" about it, given the speed people hit on Warren Road, and the fact that he still has no recall. I already know that I should have had him on a harness, rather than a choker chain in non-choke mode. Why a harness? For tethering while you're out with him, IMO your best bet would be a martingale aka "combo" collar; Petsmart sells them cheaply, and the shop next to Falls Road Animal hospital carries (or used to carry) Lupines, which aren't cheap but last forever (and have a lifetime guarantee, to boot). Most professional or commercial dog walkers insist on them for client dogs, because if they're adjusted properly, they're damn near escape-proof but can't choke the dog, and are comfortable otherwise. Not to mention easy to take on and off, since they just slip over the dog's head. I do have a limited slip flat collar that is probably what you are suggesting. It sems to work fairly well. Thanks. Paul and Muttley |
|
|||
|
"Melinda Shore" wrote in message ... In article A6uik.22$wS4.19@trnddc03, \(the\)duckster wrote: What did you do to restore order? Back to basics. I couldn't tether them all to me, so whenever somebody transitioned from dozing to walking they were put outside. Night, too? I noticed your mentioned the crates are in your bedroom (mine too). Do you crate and close up the pack at night? Two start out in crates, one ont he bed. Since I get up every couple of hours to go to the bathroom. That, of course, motivates the four-leggeds to do the same. 11:00, 1:00, 3:00 - you can set your watch by us. My peeing issues seem to be more anxiety centered. Any change in the normal - like the arrival of Phelps the electrican to deal with the pool heater - and my locking up the mob in the house. Bodie had a fit, marched downstairs cocked, aimed, fired onto the dehumidifier. Then nailed a comfortor upstairs. Thank goodness for a good carpet cleaner, rubber undersheets, and a good investment in a top loading washer and high efficiency dryer. Happens now so infrequently that I cannot get a handle on the trigger other than maybe stress. The two other ones happily do not respond in kind. Kind regards, (the)duckster |
|
|||
|
In article RcZik.138$JH5.52@trnddc06,
\(the\)duckster wrote: Night, too? No, although I usually get up at least once during the night and if someone gets up with me I'll put them out for a few minutes. I noticed your mentioned the crates are in your bedroom (mine too). Do you crate and close up the pack at night? No, not at all. The crates stay open. One thing that the different dogs have responded to differently is that Jack likes to crate-sample, often falling asleep in other dogs' crates. Eclipse doesn't like it, most of the other dogs don't care, but it's got Saber, who's blind, nervous about entering his own crate. I assume it's because he can't see whether or not there's another dog in there already. More annoying to me, perhaps, is that Jack likes to play nose hockey with Emmett's dish in Emmett's crate. Very noisy, so I now pick up everybody's dishes before bed. My peeing issues seem to be more anxiety centered. Any change in the normal - like the arrival of Phelps the electrican to deal with the pool heater - and my locking up the mob in the house. Bodie had a fit, marched downstairs cocked, aimed, fired onto the dehumidifier. Then nailed a comfortor upstairs. No, that's nothing like what was going on here. Image has marked spots in the house as a toilet and the other dogs were like "Look - a toilet!" -- Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community |
|
|||
|
On Jul 25, 8:04*pm, "Paul E. Schoen" wrote:
"Phyrie" wrote in message ... "Paul E. Schoen" wrote in message .. . I expect to be either criticized or ignored. That's OK. Neither will change what happened, or in any way be constructive. I already know that I should have had him on a harness, rather than a choker chain in non-choke mode. Usually he's fine that way while I'm watching him, but sometimes he rolls around and the chain can slip off. And it's dangerous to use it on a tether in choke mode. Paul and "FreeDog" Muttley Oh, Paul, if you know Muttley shouldn't be in a choke chain on a tether, why was he? *I was so willing to give you (and everyone else here) the benefit of the doubt, but I can't help but believe that what they say about you is true. *If you knew it was wrong, and did it anyway, and THEN posted here so people could give you **** about it, you are an attention-seeking idiot. *If I do something really ****ing stupid, and I know it was stupid, I would keep it to myself. *Why open myself up for a smackdown, unless all I want is to generate ANY kind of feedback. *Even if it's "You're a dumbass" kind of attention. *Not that you care, but I'm finished with you now. *I hope your stupidity doesn't cause Muttley's injury or death, but I'm doubtful anyone so idiotic, self-centred and self-deluded as you can keep him out of harm's way. Muttley, I wish you well. *You're gonna need all the help you can get.. It's not such a bad thing for temporary and supervised use, as when I'm with him out front, or when I let him out back for a few minutes to do his business if I can't take him out. But thank you for your concern. I'm sure others will either chime in with even more negative comments, or ignore it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hi!Im from kona in november rush! | Kona and other dog friends | Dog breeds | 0 | December 1st 07 07:11 AM |
| Rush, of "On The Fence' fame | Debbie S | Dog behavior | 56 | February 11th 04 06:07 PM |
| Rush, of "On The Fence' fame | Debbie S | Dog behavior | 0 | February 4th 04 08:08 PM |
| Rush, of "On The Fence' fame | Debbie S | Dog behavior | 0 | February 4th 04 08:08 PM |
| Rush, of "On The Fence' fame | Debbie S | Dog behavior | 0 | February 4th 04 08:08 PM |