Jonathan Owens of "The Independent UK" recently reported of British
campaigners warning dog and cat owners of the health risks caused by
additives in major pet food brands.
Millions of animal lovers are putting the health of their pets at risk
by feeding them brand pet foods that are packed with additives and
chemicals, according to a new, recently launched campaign.

Spearheaded by British TV vet Joe Inglis, the Campaign for Real Pet Food
warns that the increasingly common behavioral issues in children,
associated with some food additives, are also a problem with family pets.

Food allergies and intolerances are being cited as causes of bad
behavior, such as hyperactivity, and illness in pets, warns the vet,
whose concerns are backed by experts including clinical animal
behaviorist Inga MacKellar, and dog behaviorist Carolyn Menteith.
Pet food manufacturers use general phrases, such as "meat and animal
derivatives" and "EC permitted additives", in ingredient lists that hide
the real content from pet owners.
Mr Inglis, who has his own line of natural pet food, said: "Some big
brands are hoodwinking the public with the food that they put out and
labeling in such a way so that pet owners cannot make an informed
choice. Profits are being put before the welfare of pets and it's
irresponsible to be using all these artificial additives in pet foods
when there is so much anecdotal evidence that they cause harm."

The term "EC permitted additives" covers a list of about 4,000
chemicals. Some artificial colors have been shown to cause
hyperactivity, while others have the potential to cause tumors, as have
antioxidants including BHA.

Mr Inglis added: "Over the 12 years I've been a practicing vet, I have
seen a substantial rise in cases of problems caused by poor diet,
including allergies and intolerances, and behavioral issues linked to
artificial additives in food."

The campaign has already secured the support of British celebrities
including Dragon's Den entrepreneur Deborah Meaden. The businesswoman,
who has 23 pets, including two dogs, said: "With so much emphasis on 'we
are what we eat', it's about time we knew exactly what we were feeding
our pets, too."

The British designer Bruce Oldfield, who cooks fresh cod, potatoes and
vegetables daily for his dogs, also attacked pet food manufacturers.
"I'm pretty careful what I put into my own body, so I think it's
outrageous that the pet food industry should be allowed to act in a less
than transparent way," he said.

A spokesperson for the British Pet Food Manufacturers' Association,
however, said there was no evidence that pet food caused behavioral
problems in animals.

"The use of additives in pet food is strictly regulated by the EU," he
said. "The authorization process is rigorous and food/pet food additives
are regularly reviewed to ensure safety. Consumers want reassurance on
additives, but not full listing. There is no peer-reviewed scientific
evidence currently available, or that we are aware of, to suggest a link
between behavioral problems in pets and additives in pet food."

But in an attempt to prove the case against mass produced pet food
containing additives, Mr Inglis plans to run a trial with a group of 30
hearing dogs for the deaf later this year. Half will be fed on a natural
diet during their training, over several months, and half will be given
food with additives. The dogs will be assessed for any differences in
behavior and performance.
Already then, you may say now, but this only talks about pet food in
England. How does all of that relate to us pet owners in the States?

Well, knowing that you are going to throw that argument at me, I
proactively did some research on the issue here in the US. It sure
didn't come as a surprise to me that there are plenty of reasons why we
should be concerned about exactly the same issue here in our home land.
If one reads as many pet food labels as I do, too many of those
questionable ingredients sound too familiar. Stay tuned for soon to
follow part 2 on this topic when I am going to address this issue and
talk about chemicals and additives in American pet food.

http://lizzyshealthypetfood.blogspot...ad-to-bad.html

chardonnay9 wrote:
Jonathan Owens of "The Independent UK" recently reported of British
campaigners warning dog and cat owners of the health risks caused by
additives in major pet food brands.
Millions of animal lovers are putting the health of their pets at risk
by feeding them brand pet foods that are packed with additives and
chemicals, according to a new, recently launched campaign.

Spearheaded by British TV vet Joe Inglis, the Campaign for Real Pet Food
warns that the increasingly common behavioral issues in children,
associated with some food additives, are also a problem with family pets.

Food allergies and intolerances are being cited as causes of bad
behavior, such as hyperactivity, and illness in pets, warns the vet,
whose concerns are backed by experts including clinical animal
behaviorist Inga MacKellar, and dog behaviorist Carolyn Menteith.
Pet food manufacturers use general phrases, such as "meat and animal
derivatives" and "EC permitted additives", in ingredient lists that hide
the real content from pet owners.
Mr Inglis, who has his own line of natural pet food, said: "Some big
brands are hoodwinking the public with the food that they put out and
labeling in such a way so that pet owners cannot make an informed
choice. Profits are being put before the welfare of pets and it's
irresponsible to be using all these artificial additives in pet foods
when there is so much anecdotal evidence that they cause harm."

The term "EC permitted additives" covers a list of about 4,000
chemicals. Some artificial colors have been shown to cause
hyperactivity, while others have the potential to cause tumors, as have
antioxidants including BHA.

Mr Inglis added: "Over the 12 years I've been a practicing vet, I have
seen a substantial rise in cases of problems caused by poor diet,
including allergies and intolerances, and behavioral issues linked to
artificial additives in food."

The campaign has already secured the support of British celebrities
including Dragon's Den entrepreneur Deborah Meaden. The businesswoman,
who has 23 pets, including two dogs, said: "With so much emphasis on 'we
are what we eat', it's about time we knew exactly what we were feeding
our pets, too."

The British designer Bruce Oldfield, who cooks fresh cod, potatoes and
vegetables daily for his dogs, also attacked pet food manufacturers.
"I'm pretty careful what I put into my own body, so I think it's
outrageous that the pet food industry should be allowed to act in a less
than transparent way," he said.

A spokesperson for the British Pet Food Manufacturers' Association,
however, said there was no evidence that pet food caused behavioral
problems in animals.

"The use of additives in pet food is strictly regulated by the EU," he
said. "The authorization process is rigorous and food/pet food additives
are regularly reviewed to ensure safety. Consumers want reassurance on
additives, but not full listing. There is no peer-reviewed scientific
evidence currently available, or that we are aware of, to suggest a link
between behavioral problems in pets and additives in pet food."

But in an attempt to prove the case against mass produced pet food
containing additives, Mr Inglis plans to run a trial with a group of 30
hearing dogs for the deaf later this year. Half will be fed on a natural
diet during their training, over several months, and half will be given
food with additives. The dogs will be assessed for any differences in
behavior and performance.
Already then, you may say now, but this only talks about pet food in
England. How does all of that relate to us pet owners in the States?

Well, knowing that you are going to throw that argument at me, I
proactively did some research on the issue here in the US. It sure
didn't come as a surprise to me that there are plenty of reasons why we
should be concerned about exactly the same issue here in our home land.
If one reads as many pet food labels as I do, too many of those
questionable ingredients sound too familiar. Stay tuned for soon to
follow part 2 on this topic when I am going to address this issue and
talk about chemicals and additives in American pet food.

http://lizzyshealthypetfood.blogspot...ad-to-bad.html


Everyone on the edge of their seat waiting for part 2?

chardonnay9 wrote:
*garbage*

Anyone who is reading this who is not familiar with this
newsgroup, please disregard this post. Chardonnay is one
of our two resident nutcases.

Just FYI,

Dianne

(null) wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
*garbage*

Anyone who is reading this who is not familiar with this
newsgroup, please disregard this post. Chardonnay is one
of our two resident nutcases.

Just FYI,

Dianne

The truth really scares you doesn't it Dianne? Can't refute the article
so you attack the poster. I'm sure readers here have seen you do that
hundreds of times by now and know who the nut cases are.