[]
I was going through the archive of stuff I've posted today,
and I don't know how I missed this gem:

In article ,
Phil L wrote:
Tinypic.com is, as the name suggests, a website (as indsicated by the .com
bit at the end)

W00t!
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Melinda Shore wrote:
[]
I was going through the archive of stuff I've posted today,
and I don't know how I missed this gem:

In article ,
Phil L wrote:
Tinypic.com is, as the name suggests, a website (as indsicated by
the .com bit at the end)

W00t!

That's what happens when you skip through a post without actually absorbing
any of the information, you also missed this gem from the OP:

"Is there a way I can post a picture?"

If you'd read it, you wouldn't have made such a **** of yourself would you?

--
Phil L
RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008

In article ,
Phil L wrote:
If you'd read it, you wouldn't have made such a **** of yourself would you?

I would have, as well. Be that as it may, pity that you
haven't figured out how to edit quoted text for relevance,
among the myriad other things you haven't figured out about
"the internet."
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Phil L wrote:
If you'd read it, you wouldn't have made such a **** of yourself
would you?

I would have, as well. Be that as it may, pity that you
haven't figured out how to edit quoted text for relevance,
among the myriad other things you haven't figured out about
"the internet."

You appear to be in a world of your own - you now recognise that you were
incorrect to throw a hissy fit over something you'd missed (and you weren't
alone), yet you still act like a spoilt child, at least the other poster had
the sense to quit once she realised she was wrong, you just want to dig
yourself into an even deeper hole, but at least it proves to everyone else
what you are like, having the irresistable urge to continue an argument even
after realising you are talking **** and admitting as much.

--
Phil L
RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008

In article ,
Phil L wrote:
You appear to be in a world of your own - you now recognise that you were
incorrect to throw a hissy fit over something you'd missed

No, I don't. If more than one person missed it, there's an
excellent chance there was something wrong with your post.
And there was - you failed to provide any context whatsoever
for posting a URL. Go sit with chard in the "makes stuff
up" corner.

But hey, since this is *clearly* what you're all about: You
win!
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Phil L wrote:
You appear to be in a world of your own - you now recognise that you
were incorrect to throw a hissy fit over something you'd missed

No, I don't. If more than one person missed it, there's an
excellent chance there was something wrong with your post.
And there was - you failed to provide any context whatsoever
for posting a URL. Go sit with chard in the "makes stuff
up" corner.

But hey, since this is *clearly* what you're all about: You
win!

There you go again with your bullshit, 'you failed to provide any context' -
the OP asked how to upload a picture and I gave instructions on how to
upload a picture - just because you can't see 'any context' with this
extremely simple to understand exchange of information, you accuse me of
being a vet and making things up, nice smokescreen there Mel, I'm sure no
one spotted that one.

No really.

--
Phil L
RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008

In article ,
Phil L wrote:
There you go again with your bullshit, 'you failed to provide any context' -
the OP asked how to upload a picture and I gave instructions on how to
upload a picture -

And snipped the context, so several of us saw the same
thing.

But hey - you win! You? Winner! Great big winner!!
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Phil L wrote:
There you go again with your bullshit, 'you failed to provide any
context' - the OP asked how to upload a picture and I gave
instructions on how to upload a picture -

And snipped the context, so several of us saw the same
thing.

But hey - you win! You? Winner! Great big winner!!

wrote:
Hi,
My old (16yrs) border collie farm dog, has a pink-red lump on the
inside/edge of her upper eyelid. i am rather worried due to her age
and deteriorating condition. It would be around 5mm by 2-3mm and is
slightly unsightly.

Could this be a tumour? All the other websites say styes but hers is
different from the other images shown.

Is there a way I can post a picture?

go to tinypic.com, upload the picture and post the link here.

_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________

Nothing snipped, so I suggest you learn to use a newsreader, or learn to
read


--
Phil L
RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008

"Phil L" spoke these words of wisdom in news:1
:
Is there a way I can post a picture?

go to tinypic.com, upload the picture and post the link here.
So have you diagnosed the problem yet?

Did you do a biopsy?

diddy wrote:
"Phil L" spoke these words of wisdom in
news:1 :
Is there a way I can post a picture?

go to tinypic.com, upload the picture and post the link here.
So have you diagnosed the problem yet?

I wasn't intending to, have you diagnosed the problem yet? - my suggestion
merely allows someone to post a picture - HTH


Did you do a biopsy?

I wasn't intending to, have you done a biopsy yet? - my suggestion merely
allows someone to post a picture - HTH

Are all Americans simpletons?

--
Phil L
RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008