In article ,
Rocky wrote:


As to how an e-collar compares to other "shock" devices I've
tried out, my only point of reference is a TENs unit I strapped
to my hand during therapy. Damn, but it was uncomfortable, but
only when I cranked it up to the max.

I *love* TENS during therapy. Sure, it's usually been paired with moist
heat and is a break from the work and manipulation of PT, but I think it
is amazing.

I've tried an e-collar too, but not sure what to compare it to. I've
never been tazered, but considering the results of tazering vs the
results of using a remote collar, I'd say they aren't remotely the same.

--
Janet Boss
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com

I notice you provided nothing to back up your assertion that these people
are "ambulance chasers" and out for only money. To deny people at the very
least some sort of compensation of watching their beloved pets die in
misery over something that didn't have to happen shows how mean hearted
and cold you really are.

That's right. You pinned me down.

Gosh, you are so smart.

-Sharon (gone a week, back to find you're still here and it wasn't a bad
dream)

Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:

Of course I read it. I'm a lot smarter than you'd ever think Judy. I
don't choke dogs, I don't basically taser dogs (with shock collars)
and don't hit dogs. I never give negative correction.

If you think tasering is the same as a shock collar, than you are
actually *dumber* than I'd ever thought.

And I say this as someone who doesn't even use shock collars.

Ok, so you tell me why they aren't similar. You can call me dumb but I
see you provided nothing that showed that what I said was not true.

Why is that? Why do you resort to name calling instead of making your
point with facts? Is that because it's the best you can do?

You were using it as a menas of attacking someone else.

That makes *YOU* responsible for the misinformation in your post.

If you were worth it and actually had even a plassing respect for not
lying about people, I would have told you. But really, you're not worth
the time it would take.

Is it the best I can do? Nope.

Is it the best I'm willing to do to correct your misinformation? Yup.

Thanks for admitting you can't do any better.

Sharon Too wrote:
I notice you provided nothing to back up your assertion that these people
are "ambulance chasers" and out for only money. To deny people at the very
least some sort of compensation of watching their beloved pets die in
misery over something that didn't have to happen shows how mean hearted
and cold you really are.

That's right. You pinned me down.

Gosh, you are so smart.

-Sharon (gone a week, back to find you're still here and it wasn't a bad
dream)



Oh no hon, I'm not gone. Someone has to post sanely and truthfully
around here to counter all the bullshit posted by the regulars. I'm just
a little busy right now.

Oh no hon, I'm not gone. Someone has to post sanely and truthfully around
here to counter all the bullshit posted by the regulars. I'm just a little
busy right now.

You really are a condescending little bitch, hon.

Why did you alter my post and repost it as my reply? Lie much??

You never answer this, HON.