![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"Janet Boss" wrote in message ... In article , boris wrote: The vet is not sure what's going on and wants to do X-rays and CT. I'm not sure I like going on fishing expeditions. Can anyone here help clear this up? The questions I always ask myself a what do these values indicate? If more than one possibility, what is the prognosis and treatment/cure for each of these conditions? What cost will there be in treatment of this issue, both financially as well as time, duress to the dog, etc? With treatment, will we be buying time, curing, or increasing quality of life? What do you hope to find or not find with these tests? Will the treatment options be different? I'm definitely with you on this one. Basically the way I look at diagnostic tests is in terms of how it modifies the clinical outcome. Lets say (for example) that there is a test we can do. The test is very expensive, and what we're testing for is something we can't (or won't) do anything about (like an MRI to look for a tumor in a seizuring dog where you aren't going to do surgery even if you find a tumor). What is the point of doing the MRI? Nothing has changed clinically. You need to find out what your vet is hoping the rule out (or rule in) with the diagnostics. They are quite expensive, and if money is an issue here, you need to make sure you are both on the same page. Is there something that it *could* be that would be treatable in a 15 year old dog? Is there any point in knowing what it is, if you aren't going to do anything about it? I might be interested in doing a drug trial, and see if its responsive to one of the more common (and more benign) treatments. If the treatment is less invasive than the diagnostic test for that condition, aren't you best to go straight to treatment? If its not responsive, what have you lost (other than time) assuming the treatment is safe. (I'm not sure I'd want to put a 15 year old dog under an anesthetic, just to do a CT for something that we aren't like to be treating for anyways...) With my old dog, we've just learned to live with the occasional accidents, and we're thankful for every day we have left with him. Just my two cents, Dale |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Incontinence | Philip Meech | Dog health | 4 | February 28th 07 03:15 AM |
| DES not working for incontinence | Lynne | Dog health | 6 | December 1st 06 12:18 AM |
| Dog Incontinence- again!! | sh | Dog health | 4 | July 15th 06 03:17 AM |
| incontinence - causes? | Meghan Noecker | Dog health | 8 | December 2nd 03 11:48 AM |
| incontinence - causes? | Meghan Noecker | Dog health | 0 | November 21st 03 10:18 AM |