In article ,
Tara Green wrote:
I wouldn't brag about your intelligence. The
smarter you are, ten that means you are being
willfully ignorant and irresponsible.

Interesting point.

But now you insist that you're
a genius, which means you *could* be making
responsible and informed suggestions. But you
don't.

Intelligence and knowledge don't necessarily go together,
and it may be the case that she's perfectly bright (although
the way she processes and synthesizes [or not] information
leads me to believe otherwise), but if she were bright then
there's some reason she's not learning this stuff.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:

And here's why I think that you're probably technically of
below-average intelligence:

You should know that one! LOL!
Actually I've passed the MENSA test years back. That is how far off
you are in your ignorant comments based on twisting my words.

I wouldn't brag about your intelligence. The smarter you are, ten that
means you are being willfully ignorant and irresponsible.

No it doesn't.

Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:

I gave examples which is no different and easier for the newbies to
understand so that's a lie.

Sorry, nope. You did not talk about the need for a balanced
diet or the need to pay attention to nutrition.

Of course I didn't. Balanced diets were not the topic. I didn't talk
about how to improve your golf game either because neither were relevant.

When you are *suggesting* that someone inexperienced start feeding high
fat raw meats, you are OBLIGATED to discuss it.


No I'm not.

Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
chardonnay9 wrote:
Why do you make stuff up like that?

It's not "made up" - it's what you'e posted. You've said
that as long as you feed raw the dog's nutritional needs
will be met.

Nope, I didn't say that so that's a lie.

She was a bit off, but she was close.

You DID say that as long as you stick to the 80-10-10 model and feed it
raw, your dog's nutritional needs will be met.

That's not made up. YOU SAID THAT.

You've also failed to provide any specifics
about nutrition in any of your posts. For a very recent
example, when you recommended a high-fat diet for a dog the
owner said is thin, you didn't say what percentage of the
diet the fat should constitute,

I gave examples

That's a lie. You made a suggestion that he feed those things. Then you
gave examples of what he should feed.

which is no different and easier for the newbies to understand so
that's a lie.

No, its not a lie at all. You've been lying ever since in order to
backpedal what you did.

I see you still have to make stuff up.

Nope. You give so much ammo from being careless and irresponsible that
the only "making things up" happens when you realize what you've just
done and then you try to pretend it didn;t happen.

Archives don't llie....and yet you've lied in a post *with the very
quotes from you in it*

That takes a special kind of denial.

Quit making stuff up!

chardonnay9 wrote:
Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:

I gave examples which is no different and easier for the newbies to
understand so that's a lie.

Sorry, nope. You did not talk about the need for a balanced
diet or the need to pay attention to nutrition.

Of course I didn't. Balanced diets were not the topic. I didn't talk
about how to improve your golf game either because neither were
relevant.

When you are *suggesting* that someone inexperienced start feeding
high fat raw meats, you are OBLIGATED to discuss it.


No I'm not.

You snipped the part where the other choice
was to just deal with people calling your
advice irresponsible and ill informed.

I guess that's the path you're opting to stay
on then.

chardonnay9 wrote:
Tara Green wrote:
chardonnay9 wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
chardonnay9 wrote:
Why do you make stuff up like that?

It's not "made up" - it's what you'e posted. You've said
that as long as you feed raw the dog's nutritional needs
will be met.

Nope, I didn't say that so that's a lie.

She was a bit off, but she was close.

You DID say that as long as you stick to the 80-10-10 model and feed
it raw, your dog's nutritional needs will be met.

That's not made up. YOU SAID THAT.

You've also failed to provide any specifics
about nutrition in any of your posts. For a very recent
example, when you recommended a high-fat diet for a dog the
owner said is thin, you didn't say what percentage of the
diet the fat should constitute,

I gave examples

That's a lie. You made a suggestion that he feed those things. Then
you gave examples of what he should feed.

which is no different and easier for the newbies to understand so
that's a lie.

No, its not a lie at all. You've been lying ever since in order to
backpedal what you did.

I see you still have to make stuff up.

Nope. You give so much ammo from being careless and irresponsible that
the only "making things up" happens when you realize what you've just
done and then you try to pretend it didn;t happen.

Archives don't llie....and yet you've lied in a post *with the very
quotes from you in it*

That takes a special kind of denial.

Quit making stuff up!

The only one here doing that is....


*you*