Tara Green wrote:
Ian Bell wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Ian Bell wrote:
Let me guess. You work for panix.com as advertised in your signature.

You're a brilliant, brilliant man.

pot, kettle, black

Cheers



That's a serious stretch. And bullshit.

A non-referenced sig line has **** all to do with an outright
advertisement with no participation in the discussion community.


LOL. Now you stoop to swearing and you feel so guilty about the blatant
advertising in your sig that you deliberately omit it.

Cheers

Ian

On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:12:38 +0100, Ian Bell
wrote:

Tara Green wrote:
Ian Bell wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Ian Bell wrote:
Let me guess. You work for panix.com as advertised in your signature.

You're a brilliant, brilliant man.

pot, kettle, black

Cheers



That's a serious stretch. And bullshit.

A non-referenced sig line has **** all to do with an outright
advertisement with no participation in the discussion community.


LOL. Now you stoop to swearing and you feel so guilty about the blatant
advertising in your sig that you deliberately omit it.

"bullshit" and "**** all" isn't swearing. HTH.

Also, I don't see that Tara has a sig. Perhaps you've confused
posters. Since no one is interested in your spamming and advertising,
why don't you just go away? Or have you nothing else to do?

Ian Bell wrote:
Tara Green wrote:
Ian Bell wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Ian Bell wrote:
Let me guess. You work for panix.com as advertised in your signature.

You're a brilliant, brilliant man.

pot, kettle, black

Cheers



That's a serious stretch. And bullshit.

A non-referenced sig line has **** all to do with an outright
advertisement with no participation in the discussion community.


LOL. Now you stoop to swearing and you feel so guilty about the blatant
advertising in your sig that you deliberately omit it.


Learn how to read.

I don't have a sig.

More than one person here is suggesting that
you did the wrong thing. Try not to confuse
multiple people who take issue with your
behavior with all posts pointing it out being
from the same individual. That would be yet
another mistake on your part.

Tara Green said in
rec.pets.dogs.health:

More than one person here is suggesting that
you did the wrong thing.

Maybe he found my website, so he didn't confuse me with y'all.
While existent, my boobs are far from feminine.

--
--Matt. Rocky's a Dog.

sighthounds & siberians wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:12:38 +0100, Ian Bell
wrote:

Tara Green wrote:
Ian Bell wrote:
Melinda Shore wrote:
In article ,
Ian Bell wrote:
Let me guess. You work for panix.com as advertised in your signature.
You're a brilliant, brilliant man.
pot, kettle, black

Cheers


That's a serious stretch. And bullshit.

A non-referenced sig line has **** all to do with an outright
advertisement with no participation in the discussion community.

LOL. Now you stoop to swearing and you feel so guilty about the blatant
advertising in your sig that you deliberately omit it.

"bullshit" and "**** all" isn't swearing. HTH.


You have a strange idea of swearing then.

Also, I don't see that Tara has a sig. Perhaps you've confused
posters.

Yes, I did. My mistake. I apologise for that.

Cheers

Ian

On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:07:11 +0100, Ian Bell
wrote:



"bullshit" and "**** all" isn't swearing. HTH.


You have a strange idea of swearing then.

My idea of words tends to be their definitions.

Also, I don't see that Tara has a sig. Perhaps you've confused
posters.

Yes, I did. My mistake. I apologise for that.

Cheers

Bye, spammer.

"sighthounds & siberians" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:07:11 +0100, Ian Bell
wrote:



"bullshit" and "**** all" isn't swearing. HTH.


You have a strange idea of swearing then.

My idea of words tends to be their definitions.

As it should be. However, you may say "bovine scatology", "cow flops", and
even "universal intercourse" on prime time TV or even in church or an
elementary school, but utter the phrases that you claim to be "not
swearing" in those venues and see how long it takes for you to get bleeped
or arrested or accosted by someone.

It seems the voices of the netKops with their knee-jerk hostility to a post
that could only very marginally be considered spam have nothing better to
do have wasted their time by generating 30 posts in a thread that could
just as well have been ignored or given a more positive response to what
may very well be a lovely song.

Paul and Muttley
www.MuttleyDog.com

"Ian Bell" wrote in message
...

You have a strange idea of swearing then.

I might say those words at home but I certainly wouldn't say them in a shop
or a library!
In South England,especially London, we used say bloody hell or bleeding
hell, which in the 60s used to be considered a bit rude.
When I heard Leona Lewis's síngle was called Bleeding Love, I thought
bloody hell, that's a funny name for a song! LOL
BTW I liked song you posted the link too.