![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: controversy, dominance |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Traditional training techniques are based on the idea that we must
become the dominant leader and rule our pets the way a wolf would rule a pack. That is, they assume most misbehavior in dogs is due to the dog is trying to be dominant and then they employ techniques that they think a wolf (since dogs are seen as having a social structure similar to wolves) would perform in a wolf pack. In order to evaluate whether this reasoning is valid, we must first understand what dominance is. Dominance is not a personality trait. If you take four individuals, each who is the highest ranked member of its group and put them together in a new group, they will fight and establish a rank order of 1-4 between them. Thus only one of the individuals who was ranked highest in its own group will have highest rank now. Having a stable rank does not mean the situation is peaceful. Rank is maintained through ritualistic aggressive acts on the part of the higher ranked individual and appeasement or deference on the part of the lower ranked individual. In many groups, once rank is obtained, individuals can then forge stronger bonds though mutual grooming or other bonding behaviors. Some alpha individuals have more aggressive styles of maintaining rank while others have a calm, more subtle style. Different species also have different tendencies. For instance macaques monkey are notoriously despotic and aggressive and removal of the high ranked individual for just several hours can result in immediate restructuring (fighting) within the group. Similarly with mixed packs of wolves, such as occurs in captivity, removal of higher ranked wolves can lead a need to re-establish rank once the individual is reintroduced. Note that this model of group structure and leadership is similar to what occurs on shows such as the Sopranos and Madmen. Wolves in the wild generally do not gain their high rank by fighting their way to the top. Instead a male and female breed and the pack is a family unit comprised of the parents and the offspring. The parents naturally become the leaders. The offspring naturally follow their lead. As a result of this discovery regarding pack structure, wolf biologists no longer even use the term alpha with wild wolf packs. http://askdryin.com/dominance.php?act=play&mov=1#end |
|
|||
|
Char wrote:
Traditional training techniques are based on the idea that we must become the dominant leader and rule our pets the way a wolf would rule a pack. That is, they assume most misbehavior in dogs is due to the dog is trying to be dominant and then they employ techniques that they think a wolf (since dogs are seen as having a social structure similar to wolves) would perform in a wolf pack. In order to evaluate whether this reasoning is valid, we must first understand what dominance is. Dominance is not a personality trait. If you take four individuals, each who is the highest ranked member of its group and put them together in a new group, they will fight and establish a rank order of 1-4 between them. Thus only one of the individuals who was ranked highest in its own group will have highest rank now. Having a stable rank does not mean the situation is peaceful. Rank is maintained through ritualistic aggressive acts on the part of the higher ranked individual and appeasement or deference on the part of the lower ranked individual. In many groups, once rank is obtained, individuals can then forge stronger bonds though mutual grooming or other bonding behaviors. Some alpha individuals have more aggressive styles of maintaining rank while others have a calm, more subtle style. Different species also have different tendencies. For instance macaques monkey are notoriously despotic and aggressive and removal of the high ranked individual for just several hours can result in immediate restructuring (fighting) within the group. Similarly with mixed packs of wolves, such as occurs in captivity, removal of higher ranked wolves can lead a need to re-establish rank once the individual is reintroduced. Note that this model of group structure and leadership is similar to what occurs on shows such as the Sopranos and Madmen. Wolves in the wild generally do not gain their high rank by fighting their way to the top. Instead a male and female breed and the pack is a family unit comprised of the parents and the offspring. The parents naturally become the leaders. The offspring naturally follow their lead. As a result of this discovery regarding pack structure, wolf biologists no longer even use the term alpha with wild wolf packs. http://askdryin.com/dominance.php?act=play&mov=1#end Interesting article. I can see the relevance to rescue dogs or dogs that have been beaten in to submission. Does any body do that any more? With one exception. When my dog was being aggressive with another dog I grabbed my and pushed it onto the ground in a submission pose (that is what I was told to do) by experts. It did not work!! I mean it usually worked at one meeting 50% of the time. I found a better way was to put my dog on the lead an take it for a walk and let it forget about it then release it latter. I now put my dog on the lead and walk it away and release it again |
|
|||
|
Avid Fan wrote:
Char wrote: Traditional training techniques are based on the idea that we must become the dominant leader and rule our pets the way a wolf would rule a pack. That is, they assume most misbehavior in dogs is due to the dog is trying to be dominant and then they employ techniques that they think a wolf (since dogs are seen as having a social structure similar to wolves) would perform in a wolf pack. In order to evaluate whether this reasoning is valid, we must first understand what dominance is. Dominance is not a personality trait. If you take four individuals, each who is the highest ranked member of its group and put them together in a new group, they will fight and establish a rank order of 1-4 between them. Thus only one of the individuals who was ranked highest in its own group will have highest rank now. Having a stable rank does not mean the situation is peaceful. Rank is maintained through ritualistic aggressive acts on the part of the higher ranked individual and appeasement or deference on the part of the lower ranked individual. In many groups, once rank is obtained, individuals can then forge stronger bonds though mutual grooming or other bonding behaviors. Some alpha individuals have more aggressive styles of maintaining rank while others have a calm, more subtle style. Different species also have different tendencies. For instance macaques monkey are notoriously despotic and aggressive and removal of the high ranked individual for just several hours can result in immediate restructuring (fighting) within the group. Similarly with mixed packs of wolves, such as occurs in captivity, removal of higher ranked wolves can lead a need to re-establish rank once the individual is reintroduced. Note that this model of group structure and leadership is similar to what occurs on shows such as the Sopranos and Madmen. Wolves in the wild generally do not gain their high rank by fighting their way to the top. Instead a male and female breed and the pack is a family unit comprised of the parents and the offspring. The parents naturally become the leaders. The offspring naturally follow their lead. As a result of this discovery regarding pack structure, wolf biologists no longer even use the term alpha with wild wolf packs. http://askdryin.com/dominance.php?act=play&mov=1#end Interesting article. I can see the relevance to rescue dogs or dogs that have been beaten in to submission. Does any body do that any more? With one exception. When my dog was being aggressive with another dog I grabbed my and pushed it onto the ground in a submission pose (that is what I was told to do) by experts. It did not work!! I mean it usually worked at one meeting 50% of the time. I found a better way was to put my dog on the lead an take it for a walk and let it forget about it then release it latter. I now put my dog on the lead and walk it away and release it again I guess dogs know fake submission when they see it, huh? So much for the experts. |
|
|||
|
Char wrote:
Avid Fan wrote: Char wrote: Traditional training techniques are based on the idea that we must become the dominant leader and rule our pets the way a wolf would rule a pack. That is, they assume most misbehavior in dogs is due to the dog is trying to be dominant and then they employ techniques that they think a wolf (since dogs are seen as having a social structure similar to wolves) would perform in a wolf pack. In order to evaluate whether this reasoning is valid, we must first understand what dominance is. Dominance is not a personality trait. If you take four individuals, each who is the highest ranked member of its group and put them together in a new group, they will fight and establish a rank order of 1-4 between them. Thus only one of the individuals who was ranked highest in its own group will have highest rank now. Having a stable rank does not mean the situation is peaceful. Rank is maintained through ritualistic aggressive acts on the part of the higher ranked individual and appeasement or deference on the part of the lower ranked individual. In many groups, once rank is obtained, individuals can then forge stronger bonds though mutual grooming or other bonding behaviors. Some alpha individuals have more aggressive styles of maintaining rank while others have a calm, more subtle style. Different species also have different tendencies. For instance macaques monkey are notoriously despotic and aggressive and removal of the high ranked individual for just several hours can result in immediate restructuring (fighting) within the group. Similarly with mixed packs of wolves, such as occurs in captivity, removal of higher ranked wolves can lead a need to re-establish rank once the individual is reintroduced. Note that this model of group structure and leadership is similar to what occurs on shows such as the Sopranos and Madmen. Wolves in the wild generally do not gain their high rank by fighting their way to the top. Instead a male and female breed and the pack is a family unit comprised of the parents and the offspring. The parents naturally become the leaders. The offspring naturally follow their lead. As a result of this discovery regarding pack structure, wolf biologists no longer even use the term alpha with wild wolf packs. http://askdryin.com/dominance.php?act=play&mov=1#end Interesting article. I can see the relevance to rescue dogs or dogs that have been beaten in to submission. Does any body do that any more? With one exception. When my dog was being aggressive with another dog I grabbed my and pushed it onto the ground in a submission pose (that is what I was told to do) by experts. It did not work!! I mean it usually worked at one meeting 50% of the time. I found a better way was to put my dog on the lead an take it for a walk and let it forget about it then release it latter. I now put my dog on the lead and walk it away and release it again I guess dogs know fake submission when they see it, huh? So much for the experts. Indeed. But nothing seems to work 100%. My dog was on an off leash beach we went into the bush behind it. I saw a Kangaroo and immediately called my dog. Too late my saw it first dog was all exited and chased it ( have never seen my dog truly bite anything other than its food) The Kangaroo was much faster which is just as well as have extremely powerful hind legs and can easily disembowel a dog if cornered. I normally have pretty good recall on my dog but in truly dangerous situations you which they will come back to you. I feel sorry for the Kangaroo too. I don't want wildlife scared out of their mind or injured in the chase. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dominance conundrum | George[_2_] | Dog behavior | 3 | April 30th 07 02:45 PM |
| dominance struggles | culprit | Dog behavior | 0 | March 3rd 04 07:47 PM |
| dominance struggles | culprit | Dog behavior | 0 | March 3rd 04 07:47 PM |
| Forcing dominance??? | Dog behavior | 0 | September 30th 03 01:20 PM | |
| Dominance | Mark/Shell | Dog behavior | 10 | July 18th 03 08:20 PM |