![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:57:16 -0400, Sharon Delarose
wrote: In article , sonofdog wrote: please ! take it easy, you have spammed the group enough already It was never my intention, sonofdog, to discuss the book here and I would be most happy to NOT discuss it and go back to the subject of Sierra and Sammy and others. You advertise your book with every post. I think it started with someone's comment that I allegedly wrote a book and escalated from there. I did feel that several were ganging up on me as if the book were a mortal sin and as people were asking specific questions about the content, I posted portions thereof in the hopes of alleviating the perceived sinfulness. Don't be an ass. No one said writing the book was a sin; that's ridiculous. You wrote the book; that's fact, not allegation. Writing a non-fiction book implies that the writer has some sort of knowledge or expertise about the subject. From your posts here, some people here, myself included, have concluded that you are not qualified to write a book giving advice on training problem dogs. From the excerpts of the book you've posted, I (and perhaps some others) have concluded that you're not a particularly good writer. Don't start whining the 'everyone's being mean to me on rpdb' refrain. If you come on a public, unmoderated dog behavior group and advertise your book, you should expect to be critiqued. |
|
|||
|
On 11 Oct 2010 02:26:50 GMT, Matt wrote:
Sharon Delarose said in rec.pets.dogs.behavior: The dog experts pretty much all agree that it's better to train your dog with a reward system than a fear system... This is the type of stuff I don't like. Since when was reward the opposite of fear? When one is "misinformed"? Heh. -- Dogman |
|
|||
|
"Sharon Delarose" wrote
sonofdog wrote: please ! take it easy, you have spammed the group enough already It was never my intention, sonofdog, to discuss the book here and I would be most happy to NOT discuss it and go back to the subject of Sierra and Sammy and others. I think it started with someone's comment that I allegedly wrote a book and escalated from there. I did feel that several were ganging up on me as if the book were a mortal sin and as people were asking specific questions about the content, I posted portions thereof in the hopes of alleviating the perceived sinfulness. It was Dogman and he disparaged your book, starting with comments about the mixed dog breed name. |
|
|||
|
"sighthounds & siberians" wrote
Sharon Delarose wrote: It was never my intention, sonofdog, to discuss the book here and I would be most happy to NOT discuss it and go back to the subject of Sierra and Sammy and others. You advertise your book with every post. She has a link like many have as a post signature. It leads to a web site with many things, some of which are pet related and if you look about, you'll see bits on the book as well. I think it started with someone's comment that I allegedly wrote a book and escalated from there. I did feel that several were ganging up on me Don't be an ass. No one said writing the book was a sin; that's ridiculous. You wrote the book; that's fact, not allegation. Writing a non-fiction book implies that the writer has some sort of knowledge or expertise about the subject. From your posts here, some people here, myself included, have concluded that you are not qualified to write a book giving advice on training problem dogs. From the excerpts of the book you've posted, I (and perhaps some others) have concluded that you're not a particularly good writer. Don't start whining the 'everyone's being mean to me on rpdb' refrain. If you come on a public, unmoderated dog behavior group and advertise your book, you should expect to be critiqued. So, stop asking about the book if you do not want to see it. That simple. She only posted it in reply to another who hunted her link and found it then mentioned it and started this mess over it. She didnt bring up the book herself here. |
|
|||
|
On Oct 11, 3:50*pm, "cshenk" wrote:
"sighthounds & siberians" wrote Sharon Delarose wrote: It was never my intention, sonofdog, to discuss the book here and I would be most happy to NOT discuss it and go back to the subject of Sierra and Sammy and others. You advertise your book with every post. She has a link like many have as a post signature. *It leads to a web site with many things, some of which are pet related and if you look about, you'll see bits on the book as well. When someone's post sig includes a link to a web site where they talk about a book they wrote, that's an advertisement. I think it started with someone's comment that I allegedly wrote a book and escalated from there. *I did feel that several were ganging up on me Don't be an ass. *No one said writing the book was a sin; that's ridiculous. *You wrote the book; that's fact, not allegation. *Writing a non-fiction book implies that the writer has some sort of knowledge or expertise about the subject. *From your posts here, some people here, myself included, have concluded that you are not qualified to write a book giving advice on training problem dogs. *From the excerpts of the book you've posted, I (and perhaps some others) have concluded that you're not a particularly good writer. *Don't start whining the 'everyone's being mean to me on rpdb' refrain. *If you come on a public, unmoderated dog behavior group and advertise your book, you should expect to be critiqued. So, stop asking about the book if you do not want to see it. *That simple. She only posted it in reply to another who hunted her link and found it then mentioned it and started this mess over it. *She didnt bring up the book herself here. I haven't asked about the book, I've commented on it. I have the right to do that, and if you don't like my comments, don't read them. It doesn't make any difference whether she or someone else brought the book up. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:46:04 -0400, "cshenk" wrote:
"Sharon Delarose" wrote sonofdog wrote: please ! take it easy, you have spammed the group enough already It was never my intention, sonofdog, to discuss the book here and I would be most happy to NOT discuss it and go back to the subject of Sierra and Sammy and others. I think it started with someone's comment that I allegedly wrote a book and escalated from there. I did feel that several were ganging up on me as if the book were a mortal sin and as people were asking specific questions about the content, I posted portions thereof in the hopes of alleviating the perceived sinfulness. It was Dogman and he disparaged your book, starting with comments about the mixed dog breed name. Correction: I have never disparaged Sharon's book. I'd have to read it before I could do that, and I haven't, and have no plans to do so. And for the umpteenth time, there is no such thing as freakin' "Ausky breed," which Sharon calls it on her web site. And there is no such thing as a "mixed dog breed name" either. That is known as a contradiction in terms, learning disability or no learning disability. Now crawl back down into your vat of **** and have another swim. -- Dogman |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:50:52 -0400, "cshenk" wrote:
She only posted it in reply That's simply not true. There's a link to it in her sig file. Thus, it's in every post she makes. What a maroon. PS: When was the last time you got anything right? Can you even remember back that far? -- Dogman |
|
|||
|
"Sharon Delarose" wrote in message ... Short of giving a stranger the key to my house, which isn't going to happen, we did not have that option. I do not trust many people with the key to my home. Few people I've met would bring someone in midday. I know that is the recommendation. I also know that your average dog owner will not do it. You DO (or DID) have that option! You can hire a professional dog caretaker to help you care for your dog when you can't. This rampant paranoia of Americans is sad and pitiful, but to force your dog into holding her bladder for many hours because you don't want someone you haven't known since third grade to have access to your house is just stupid. Do you also not allow your housekeeper to come in, or your plumber? Sometimes professionals need to enter your house. Sheesh. I'm an average dog owner. Very average. I wouldn't ever leave my dog for that long alone in my house. If I need to be away for longer than an hour or two, I put him in day care or take him with me. But I DO hire people to come in and feed the cat, the fish, and the rabbits when I can't, or I'm away for a few days. It's their job. And I'm grateful that there are people out there willing to provide this very valuable service to me. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Animal Cruelty: The Key to Serial Minds | mrhaiboss@gmail.com | Dog breeds | 0 | December 20th 08 09:38 AM |
| Easing Stress of Moving | Les Hilliard | Dog behavior | 4 | May 20th 06 11:20 AM |
| Easing Stress of Moving (update) | Les Hilliard | Dog behavior | 2 | May 20th 06 03:02 AM |