On 12/2/2010 1:19 PM, P E Schoen wrote:
"Char" wrote in message
m...

On 11/26/2010 10:15 AM, Char wrote:

I don't believe you. I don't believe you fostered or adopted any dogs.
For me to waste my time on posts to you that take time and thought I'd
have to see pics of these dogs with your dog and you first.

Till then I don't believe you.

Funny how I challenge you to prove you have these dogs and the one
conveniently dies off.

Char, I really have to call you out for these comments. I read most of
your advice with an open mind and you have supported me when people like
Dogman use personal attacks against me, but there is really no reason to
challenge someone to provide proof of something like whether or not they
have dogs. Why would someone lie about that?

And your comment about one of her dogs "conveniently" dying off is
inexcusable. I'll just assume you have been under stress or in pain and
thus not thinking clearly about your replies.

Paul and Muttley

I guess you haven't been reading her posts about all the miracle tricks
her dogs can do. It's plain bullshit. I've flat out caught her lying
about things in the past. People don't change. Like House says,"
Everybody lies." Some lie so much they create a world that doesn't exist
in reality.

As for the coldness of my comments about the dog dying, go back and read
what she wrote about Sammy the past few weeks and tell me she sounds
genuine. Her comments were pretty cold too.

It doesn't matter that you don't see what I do. I'm not out to change
what you think but I am saying what I truly feel and that's that.

On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:31:27 -0500, Char
wrote:

On 11/26/2010 10:15 AM, Char wrote:
On 11/20/2010 5:06 PM, cshenk wrote:
Hi Char,

Could use your advice again. I'm fostering (probably adopt if she works
out) yet another dog.

I don't believe you. I don't believe you fostered or adopted any dogs.
For me to waste my time on posts to you that take time and thought I'd
have to see pics of these dogs with your dog and you first.

Till then I don't believe you.

Funny how I challenge you to prove you have these dogs and the one
conveniently dies off.

That's really incredibly rude and insensitive, even for you - and
that's saying something. How utterly ironic that you think it's fine
for you to say this, after claiming that my statement that my dogs
aren't my children is offensive and flaming?

You're a real piece of work.

On 12/2/2010 8:58 PM, sighthounds & siberians wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:31:27 -0500,
wrote:

On 11/26/2010 10:15 AM, Char wrote:
On 11/20/2010 5:06 PM, cshenk wrote:
Hi Char,

Could use your advice again. I'm fostering (probably adopt if she works
out) yet another dog.

I don't believe you. I don't believe you fostered or adopted any dogs.
For me to waste my time on posts to you that take time and thought I'd
have to see pics of these dogs with your dog and you first.

Till then I don't believe you.

Funny how I challenge you to prove you have these dogs and the one
conveniently dies off.

That's really incredibly rude and insensitive, even for you

Let's face it. It's not the message you have a problem with but the
messenger. If say, Janet or Dogboy had made the same comment you'd be
behind them all the way.

You go ahead and get taken in by a flat out liar, I could care less.

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:37:34 -0500, Char
wrote:

On 12/2/2010 8:58 PM, sighthounds & siberians wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:31:27 -0500,
wrote:

On 11/26/2010 10:15 AM, Char wrote:
On 11/20/2010 5:06 PM, cshenk wrote:
Hi Char,

Could use your advice again. I'm fostering (probably adopt if she works
out) yet another dog.

I don't believe you. I don't believe you fostered or adopted any dogs.
For me to waste my time on posts to you that take time and thought I'd
have to see pics of these dogs with your dog and you first.

Till then I don't believe you.

Funny how I challenge you to prove you have these dogs and the one
conveniently dies off.

That's really incredibly rude and insensitive, even for you

Let's face it. It's not the message you have a problem with but the
messenger. If say, Janet or Dogboy had made the same comment you'd be
behind them all the way.

You and your paranoid cabal theories. I am not "behind" anybody here
and I don't go around saying "yeah, me too" to anybody's posts. If
you had any abilities whatsoever in the areas of objective reasoning,
discernment and reading comprehension you would know this. Since you
don't, I'll make it really, really clear for you. The only reason I
would be "behind" anyone who made a comment like this comment that you
made: "Funny how I challenge you to prove you have these dogs and the
one conveniently dies off." would be to kick them in the ass.

You go ahead and get taken in by a flat out liar, I could care less.

There you go again with your comprehension skills. "I could care
less" means that you actually do care. I think what you mean is "I
could not care less"; it means that you already care so little that
the amount you care cannot be reduced. (You're welcome.) There have
been plenty of liars around here over the years. Why, some people
even think you're a liar. It wasn't that long ago that you were
defending Carol against what you thought were the ruthless attacks of
the Cabal of Regulars. What changed? Not that it matters, because
anybody who defends Schoen is clearly lacking.

"sighthounds & siberians" wrote in message
...

What changed? Not that it matters, because
anybody who defends Schoen is clearly lacking.

Well, I have never lied on this forum, and anything that might have been
proven untrue was always stated as an opinion. Or possibly obvious sarcasm.
I don't know why Char has suddenly accused Carol of lying, or why she made a
hurtful remark about her recently deceased dog.

I can't say that I have never made an intentionally hurtful remark on this
newsgroup, or that I have never criticized or ridiculed anyone, but those
have been in retaliation for false accusations and demeaning comments by
"the usual suspects". I have challenged everyone to provide a citation for
any false statement I have ever made since 2006, and none have been
forthcoming. And I have never attacked anyone except in self-defense, and I
have not used vulgarity except in response to others.

Anyone care to take up my challenge?

And I'd like to have Char cite whatever cshenk posted that she considers a
lie. But I'm not going to make a crusade about it. "The Usual Suspects" are
the jihadists and extremists here.

Paul and Muttley
www.muttleydog.com

On 12/3/2010 11:11 AM, sighthounds & siberians wrote:

I am not "behind" anybody here

*snicker*

"P E Schoen" wrote in message ...


I have challenged everyone to provide a citation for any false statement I
have ever made since 2006, and none have been forthcoming. And I have never
attacked anyone except in self-defense, and I have not used vulgarity
except in response to others.

You lie every time you say you are training Muttley. Every time you say
you will keep him safe. Every time you say he likes people. You lie,
perhaps most of all to yourself, about almost everything.

And this prissy, puritanical objection of yours to vulgarity is becoming a
weird obsession. Weirder still, since you use profanity when it suits you.
Although I suppose if all you can safely address in an "offensive" post is
the language the author chooses to use while delivering his opinion, I guess
you must cling to whatever thread you can. But it's odd, Schoen, and not
more than a little distasteful, that you find all this coarseness so
unseemly. I can almost see you waving a dainty white lace kerchief over
your face, declaring, "Oh, laws, that nasty vulgarity will simply be my
undoing!" Get over it, you ass. We're all adults here, and you're not the
Swear Police. Doesn't it creep you out to complain about other people's
language all the time? It sure does me, to listen to you complain about it
all the time. If you were in a group of people, and started that, "Oh my,
that's just nasty" **** when someone uses colloquial language, you'd
probably get punched out.

"Phyrie" wrote in message ...

[snip incoherent babbling and evidence of delusional psychosis by fiery (as
in flaming) Phyrie]

Cites please! I have challenged you and others and you provide only opinions
clouded by your unstable mental state. I'm surprised your little dog puts up
with your weak energy and lunatic ranting. Have you stopped abusing him yet?

P&M
"Lords and Masters of Rec.pets.dogs.behavior"