On Feb 7, 12:25*pm, "P E Schoen" wrote:
"Sandy in OK" *wrote in ...

Perhaps you were actually banned because they came here and
saw the negative comments you were making about the forum,
and the fact that you were quoting people there on here out of
context? I would look at it more as good management than
punishment.

It was actually none of the above. I was back on the forum a day later with
a new user name and I strung them along in a game where I made up a story
and played them for all it was worth. And it only served to convince me of
their stupidity and fear of any rational discussion of alternate ways of
thinking. Their people management skills are totally contradictory to what
they profess to be the best way to deal with dogs.

"What people do not discuss, they do not understand. What they do not
understand, they fear. And what they fear, they try to destroy"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Geo...142144?sk=wall

Paul and Muttley


The forum was a little limited for my taste, and a little tightly
monitored, I drifted off from it to other things. But really and
truly, it is very upfront about what kind of list and what topics are
allowed. And that it's basically about one individual's training
philosophy. If you don't like that and don't want to abide by their
rules, there are plenty of places to post that aren't as strict. I
didn't ignore their guidelines, and I didn't try to force my agenda on
them. That's what adults frequently do. They don't play stupid games,
or act like trolls. Clickeroo.