Great Dane Puppies 4 sale

We will be having Great Dane puppies for sale here in the beg of June.
They should be Harliquins and Mantles. If you are interested please
email me for more info.

These pups do have Champion in thier lines and within the last 3 yr
pedigree, plus up to 60 within the last 10 yrs. They come from some of
the very well known names.

Tre

"Tre" composed these thoughts and posted them
ups.com:

We will be having Great Dane puppies for sale here in the beg of June.
They should be Harliquins and Mantles. If you are interested please
email me for more info.

These pups do have Champion in thier lines and within the last 3 yr
pedigree, plus up to 60 within the last 10 yrs. They come from some of
the very well known names.

Tre



You forgot to mention health testing.
What health certifications do they have?
Are the parents, themselves champions? If not, just having champions in the
pedigree is worthless. Every new generation starts over regarding Champion
worthyness. Many dogs of champion parentage are not champion worthy. So
unless both Parents are champions themselves, mentioning champions in the
pedigree is meaningless

diddy wrote:
"Tre" composed these thoughts and posted them
ups.com:

We will be having Great Dane puppies for sale here in the beg of June.
They should be Harliquins and Mantles. If you are interested please
email me for more info.

These pups do have Champion in thier lines and within the last 3 yr
pedigree, plus up to 60 within the last 10 yrs. They come from some of
the very well known names.

Tre



You forgot to mention health testing.
What health certifications do they have?
Are the parents, themselves champions? If not, just having champions in the
pedigree is worthless. Every new generation starts over regarding Champion
worthyness. Many dogs of champion parentage are not champion worthy. So
unless both Parents are champions themselves, mentioning champions in the
pedigree is meaningless

hi diddy not seen you in a while.


as diddy quite rightly said they need to be health tested. if anyone
here is interested in going to see these pups the parents should have
had an elbow displasia score done,the average in danes is about 12 i
believe.

and then there will be the obvious things to check for like temprement
of the mother and her condition. *actually could anyone tell me is
there a way of having a thread permanantly at the top with basic info
like what you should expect from your breeder?*

or maybe a way us regulars can keep info at the top and we could add to
it for anyone popping in for help?

"dallygirl" composed these thoughts and posted
them oups.com:


and then there will be the obvious things to check for like temprement
of the mother and her condition. *actually could anyone tell me is
there a way of having a thread permanantly at the top with basic info
like what you should expect from your breeder?*

or maybe a way us regulars can keep info at the top and we could add to
it for anyone popping in for help?





I think this person is selling puppies, not looking for a breeder. I
think the puppies are already in gestation, so it's too late for this
litter.
But unless the actual parents are champions, the advertizer is misleading
the desirability of this litter when they state champion lineage. If
both parents have Championships, and the following health certs have been
done, this may be an awesome litter. There seems to be a strong pedigree
behind them. If the parents are not champions, then the pedigree bragged
on is essentially worthless. To clarify, I asked if the parents were
champions (no reply yet)
I also asked about health certs. (again, providing ample time for them to
reply)
The American Kennel Club Great Dane parent club requests the following
minimum tests be done on parents before breeding


Great Dane

Hip Dysplasia

* OFA evaluation
* PennHip evaluation
* OVC evaluation
* GDC evaluation

Eye Clearance

* CERF evaluation

Autoimmune thyroiditis

* OFA evaluation from an approved laboratory

Congenital Cardiac Database

* OFA evaluation

I'm eagerly awaiting the original poster's comments on whether these
suggested basic requirements have been done on both parents prior to
breeding, hopefully with certification numbers, so we can check them

Great Danes are an awesome breed, but fraught with health issues.

As to your question, dallygirl, what do you mean, keep at the top?

diddy said in rec.pets.dogs.breeds:

As to your question, dallygirl, what do you mean, keep at
the top?

I think that she's not yet sure as to how Usenet works.
Apparently, in other fora, there's a convention to toppost "TTT"
(as in "To The Top") in order to keep one's posts at the top of
the queue.

I looked this up shortly after AOL stopped providing a portal to
Usenet and a whole buncha new posters had nothing to say but
TTT.

--
--Matt. Rocky's a Dog.

Rocky composed these thoughts and posted them
:

diddy said in rec.pets.dogs.breeds:

As to your question, dallygirl, what do you mean, keep at
the top?

I think that she's not yet sure as to how Usenet works.
Apparently, in other fora, there's a convention to toppost "TTT"
(as in "To The Top") in order to keep one's posts at the top of
the queue.

I looked this up shortly after AOL stopped providing a portal to
Usenet and a whole buncha new posters had nothing to say but
TTT.


IC..
I wish if Dallygirl continues to post here, she complies to the convention
of usenet protocal instead of asking all of usenet to comply to her wishes,
which is just silly.
I think Dallygirl is a good person but resistant to conforming.

On 17 Apr 2006 18:56:24 GMT Rocky whittled these words:
I think that she's not yet sure as to how Usenet works.
Apparently, in other fora, there's a convention to toppost "TTT"
(as in "To The Top") in order to keep one's posts at the top of
the queue.

I don't think that is it. I think she is asking after what are called
"tacked" or "stickied" posts that provide FAQs, posting rules etc. Works
OK in a web based environment. Obviously this isn't workable in the news
system. Most people haven't a clue how USENET is actually distributed.
USENET is one of the original examples of the "placeless" (and therefore
very difficult to break) features of the intranet. It also means it is
not possible to even determine what the "top" is much less sticky
anything there. The closest that is done is the autoposting such as Cindy
Tittle Moore started - I don't know how that is set up.

In my experience even where such stickied posts exist they are
mostly ignored. They will certainly be ignored by those who don't want to
hear the message in the first place.

--
Diane Blackman
There is no moral victory in proclaiming to abhor violence
while preaching with violent words.
http://dog-play.com/ http://dogplayshops.com/

In article , wrote:
The closest that is done is the autoposting such as Cindy
Tittle Moore started - I don't know how that is set up.

That's easy to do with a cron job that calls inews (or
whatever is being used these days). That's if you're using
a Unix system. Windows almost certainly has job scheduling
tools available, but it's not as well-suited to scripting.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community

On 17 Apr 2006 11:11:07 -0700, "dallygirl"
wrote:

*actually could anyone tell me is
there a way of having a thread permanantly at the top with basic info
like what you should expect from your breeder?*

Not on Usenet, alas. There is a companion group to this,
rec.pets.dogs.info, which used to be used for regular posting of FAQs.
Unfortunately when I looked just now there didn't seem to be any
there.

There are some great FAQs at Diane Blackman's www.dogplay.com. Maybe
we should post links to that when these perennial basics show up?


--------------------------------------
If you really need to email me, mow the lawn.

In article ,
Elizabeth B Naime wrote:
Not on Usenet, alas.

I think it's just fine. Individual sites should always have
the last word on how their disk space is used.

I've been puzzling over what "at the top" would mean for
Usenet, and I think it's pretty clear that what it means is
that the author doesn't have even the foggiest, most
abstracted understanding of the technology. I don't think
there's any reason to expect that they should, although
traditionally Usenet users have had a basic understanding of
how things work and in the past that's helped keep things
humming and prevented the kind of misapprehension that seems
to be becoming so common. The web page interfaces lead, I
think, to a complete misunderstanding of what Usenet is
really all about and so you get these completely meaningless
requests like the one at hand.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community