If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My experiences with finding the right dog
I thought I would post this to see if others are in this same situation
and also to allow those in shelters and rescue societies to know at least what some of us are thinking. We recently lost our 9 year old Basset (whom we got from a Basset rescue group and were very good and helpful) and decided to get another smaller dog. We were looking for a dog that was medium size, less than 50 lbs. and wanted an older dog (1 to 6 years of age). Although we had several breeds in mind, we would also be open to a mutt as long as he or she was affectionate and good with our two daughters. We thought that this would be a relatively simple process but were surprised at all the hoops that we had to jump through. We looked at the local shelters to begin with thinking that we would have a good chance of finding our dog since we didn't want a puppy. What we found was that many of the dog were either much older than we wanted or shepard, dobe or lab mixes. Most of the dogs in fact were larger dogs. Many of the shelters would also not adopt dogs to those of us without a fenced in yard. In out town, that eliminates about 60-70% of the homes. I know that from talking to others that many people lie about this but I didn't feel that I should have to lie to get a dog. When I was with our basset, I either had him on lead outside or was next to him when he did his business. I then looked at several rescue organizations since we had good luck with the basset rescue. I couldn't believe some of the requirements that some of these groups had. While many had the fenced in yard requirement and home visits (the home visits could be a good idea) some groups insisted that I feed the dog a wholistic diet and even one rescue group insisted that they would not allow a dog to be adopted if the owner would not agree to feed a diet of raw meat and bones to the dog. I eventually found a breeder who had the dog for me. He was an excellent breeder who just happened to have a dog that he was retiring and it worked out well. The dog got along fine with the kids and we are very happy with our decision. He checked us out by viewing our family and how we interacted with the dog and vis versa. I realize that there are people who try to adopt who shouldn't and that some people's motivations to adopt aren't what they should be. However, many of these restrictions only serve to discourage dog ownership and force people to go to backyard breeders As an adoptive parent, we went through many hurdles including home studies, background checks and the like and have had to deal with requirements that just seem to make no sense. I would encourage shelters and rescue groups to have standards but also to be realistic. Good dog owners can have non-fenced in yards and feed dogs Iams dog food. Don't eliminate people who would like to adopt a dog just because they don't fit into your ideal dog owner profile. Just my 2 cents - your mileage may vary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think a rescue organization, or even a breeder, should *require* a
particular form of diet as long as the dog doesn't have special dietary needs..like dogs with irritable bowel syndrome or food allergies. Each rescue operates differently even if they are operating within the same breed. There does tend to be alot of micromanagement going on but a. the rescue has the ability to mircomanage b. the rescue has its own ideas on what's best for the dogs c. while its not optimal to keep dogs in rescue for a long time, the space & time are there so turning away homes isn't detrimental to the dog The fence issue is pretty standard although IME exceptions are made on an individual basis. Since alot of dogs wind up in shelters because they were loose and roaming, wanting a family to have a fence for containment makes sense. Alot of people tend to just let the dog out when weather stinks or something else is going on inside the home. If no fence is in place then there's a possibility that as soon as a back is turned, the dog runs off. Some breeds are more prone to roaming as well, either following a scent, chasing another animal, or just to go looking for fun. Anyway, the point is that rescues will have good reasons for having the requirements they do, that doesn't mean the general public will agree with them though. Their primary goal, contrary to popular belief, isn't just to place dogs in adoptive homes. The primary goal is to place dogs in "forever" homes which means that more is required than just offering food/water/shelter. This is where the individual rescue's ideas of what constitutes a "forever" home comes into play. -- Tara |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Spencer" wrote
snip However, many of these restrictions only serve to discourage dog ownership and force people to go to backyard breeders Some thoughts: A rescue's job is not to encourage dog ownership. It is to find the best home for the individual dogs in their care. A rescue cannot force anyone to do anything, especially not go to a BYB. If you can't find a good rescue, you can buy from a /responsible/ breeder. Or keep looking. As an adoptive parent, we went through many hurdles including home studies, background checks and the like and have had to deal with requirements that just seem to make no sense. They may not make sense to you, but often times there is a reason for these "rules". I find the idea of a rescue requiring a BARF diet for all their dogs a bit extreme. Could it have been just certain dogs? Some dogs need special diets for health reasons. (Case in point, my friend's Basenji who can *only* eat his diet of baked fish and potato, homemade.) If not, that's a little wierd, but I guess it's their perogotive. I would encourage shelters and rescue groups to have standards but also to be realistic. Good dog owners can have non-fenced in yards and feed dogs Iams dog food. Most good rescues have policies but can be flexible too. Not all rescue's are good, though. Some are overly lax and place dogs poorly, or have a poor support support systems for their folks and adoptors. Better to make adoption more difficult that put the poor dog through another rehoming. Hope you're happy with your new pet! -- -Andrea Stone Saorsa Basenjis http://home1.gte.net/res0s12z/ The Trolls Nest - greenmen, goblins & gargoyle wall art www.trollsnest.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Spencer" wrote in message ews.com... I thought I would post this to see if others are in this same situation and also to allow those in shelters and rescue societies to know at least what some of us are thinking. We recently lost our 9 year old Basset (whom we got from a Basset rescue group and were very good and helpful) and decided to get another smaller dog. We were looking for a dog that was medium size, less than 50 lbs. and wanted an older dog (1 to 6 years of age). Although we had several breeds in mind, we would also be open to a mutt as long as he or she was affectionate and good with our two daughters. We thought that this would be a relatively simple process but were surprised at all the hoops that we had to jump through. We looked at the local shelters to begin with thinking that we would have a good chance of finding our dog since we didn't want a puppy. What we found was that many of the dog were either much older than we wanted or shepard, dobe or lab mixes. Most of the dogs in fact were larger dogs. Many of the shelters would also not adopt dogs to those of us without a fenced in yard. In out town, that eliminates about 60-70% of the homes. I know that from talking to others that many people lie about this but I didn't feel that I should have to lie to get a dog. When I was with our basset, I either had him on lead outside or was next to him when he did his business. I then looked at several rescue organizations since we had good luck with the basset rescue. I couldn't believe some of the requirements that some of these groups had. While many had the fenced in yard requirement and home visits (the home visits could be a good idea) some groups insisted that I feed the dog a wholistic diet and even one rescue group insisted that they would not allow a dog to be adopted if the owner would not agree to feed a diet of raw meat and bones to the dog. I eventually found a breeder who had the dog for me. He was an excellent breeder who just happened to have a dog that he was retiring and it worked out well. The dog got along fine with the kids and we are very happy with our decision. He checked us out by viewing our family and how we interacted with the dog and vis versa. I realize that there are people who try to adopt who shouldn't and that some people's motivations to adopt aren't what they should be. However, many of these restrictions only serve to discourage dog ownership and force people to go to backyard breeders As an adoptive parent, we went through many hurdles including home studies, background checks and the like and have had to deal with requirements that just seem to make no sense. I would encourage shelters and rescue groups to have standards but also to be realistic. Good dog owners can have non-fenced in yards and feed dogs Iams dog food. Don't eliminate people who would like to adopt a dog just because they don't fit into your ideal dog owner profile. Just my 2 cents - your mileage may vary I am having the same problem. We are looking for a dog or puppy and all I can seem to find at the shelters/rescues are either senior dogs or dogs/puppies that will be mammoth in a few months or so. While I don't want a toy poodle, it'd be nice to find a dog that isn't going to be the size of a small horse. Also, with the fenced yard thing, same here. Even if we are looking for a small inside dog, the application for adoption asks "Do you have a fenced yard" the next line is "if no, why not?" Hello, if I am not going to leave my dog outside, why do I need to spend $3000+ to fence in part of my 2 1/2 acre yard, separating my woods from the rest of the yard just so the dog can go out and pee??? It's called a leash people! I'm getting frustrated too. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.524 / Virus Database: 321 - Release Date: 10/6/2003 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim" wrote in message ... Also, with the fenced yard thing, same here. Even if we are looking for a small inside dog, the application for adoption asks "Do you have a fenced yard" the next line is "if no, why not?" Hello, if I am not going to leave my dog outside, why do I need to spend $3000+ to fence in part of my 2 1/2 acre yard, separating my woods from the rest of the yard just so the dog can go out and pee??? It's called a leash people! have you tried putting this on the application? i don't have a fence, but when i explained my situation, i was allowed to adopt my dogs (one from rescue, one from a shelter) with no problems. don't let the questions scare you. the rules often aren't hard and fast. talk to the screeners. tell them why you think you'll provide a good home. -kelly |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Kim wrote:
I am having the same problem. We are looking for a dog or puppy and all I can seem to find at the shelters/rescues are either senior dogs or dogs/puppies that will be mammoth in a few months or so. While I don't want a toy poodle, it'd be nice to find a dog that isn't going to be the size of a small horse. That's reality, though. The older and larger dogs are harder to adopt out, so that's most likely what you'll see when you look around. Unfortunately, there is no dearth of any particular type of dog in this area, and while finding a smaller dog will take you longer, it isn't impossible. Also, with the fenced yard thing, same here. Even if we are looking for a small inside dog, the application for adoption asks "Do you have a fenced yard" the next line is "if no, why not?" Hello, if I am not going to leave my dog outside, why do I need to spend $3000+ to fence in part of my 2 1/2 acre yard, separating my woods from the rest of the yard just so the dog can go out and pee??? It's called a leash people! I'm getting frustrated too. Absolutely, put it down on the application. All the applications I've looked at asks you how you plan on exercising your dog, and keeping the dog on-leash while you go on hikes and walks is a good way to do it. Generally, when a rescue finds out that you are a responsible dog owner (especially one who has had dogs and unfenced yards before), they won't have any problems adopting to you. I can see the fenced yard being a requirement if you are adopting a particular breed of dog who has very high energy requirements and must be allowed to run off-leash in a safe area. Suja |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.pets.dogs.breeds Kim wrote:
Also, with the fenced yard thing, same here. Even if we are looking for a small inside dog, the application for adoption asks "Do you have a fenced yard" the next line is "if no, why not?" Hello, if I am not going to leave my dog outside, why do I need to spend $3000+ to fence in part of my 2 1/2 acre yard, separating my woods from the rest of the yard just so the dog can go out and pee??? It's called a leash people! For a lot of rescues that's a perfectly acceptable answer. Not acceptable would be "because I don't want to spend the money" or "because my dog will be tied up". I think dogs without fences yards often get more attention. The thing is simply to make it clear that you find turning a dog loose to "do its business" at *least* as appalling as they - and even better if you can state you have plenty of experience in not letting a dog loose even without a fenced yard. Even the last comment is perfectly appropriate. Thing is that we get an awful lot of questions here that show that people seem to forget things like leashes. "How do I stop my dog from going to the neighbors?" "How do I stop my dog from chasing cars."? .... Diane Blackman |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article , TOTE@dog-
play.com says... In rec.pets.dogs.breeds Kim wrote: Also, with the fenced yard thing, same here. Even if we are looking for a small inside dog, the application for adoption asks "Do you have a fenced yard" the next line is "if no, why not?" Hello, if I am not going to leave my dog outside, why do I need to spend $3000+ to fence in part of my 2 1/2 acre yard, separating my woods from the rest of the yard just so the dog can go out and pee??? It's called a leash people! For a lot of rescues that's a perfectly acceptable answer. Not acceptable would be "because I don't want to spend the money" or "because my dog will be tied up". I think dogs without fences yards often get more attention. The thing is simply to make it clear that you find turning a dog loose to "do its business" at *least* as appalling as they - and even better if you can state you have plenty of experience in not letting a dog loose even without a fenced yard. Even the last comment is perfectly appropriate. Thing is that we get an awful lot of questions here that show that people seem to forget things like leashes. "How do I stop my dog from going to the neighbors?" "How do I stop my dog from chasing cars."? .... Diane Blackman That would be great if rescue groups would allow that type of latitude - the problem is that if you look at their web pages (which is where most people get their information), the requirements read just like that, absolute requirements rather than a "requirement or an acceptable modification." When people see these type of web pages, they are led to believe that these requirements are written in stone and thus, got to another source. Of course, rescue groups can make any rules that they like. It would seem to me though that a goal would be to rescue as many dogs as possible and place those dogs in good homes. These homes might not be the ideal home in some small respect but it would allow more dogs to be rescue rather than trying to find the optimal environment and facing the possibility that some will not be rescued due to lack of space. I'm sure that this is an issue that groups and shelters deal with every day but given some of the responses to this issue, it might be worth reconsidering. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Spencer" wrote in message
ws.com... Of course, rescue groups can make any rules that they like. It would seem to me though that a goal would be to rescue as many dogs as possible and place those dogs in good homes. That generally is the goal. These homes might not be the ideal home in some small respect but it would allow more dogs to be rescue rather than trying to find the optimal environment and facing the possibility that some will not be rescued due to lack of space. I disagree with the above. That's not to say that I think there's a such thing as a "perfect" home as each one is different in a great many aspects. However, placing a dog in a less than as-close-to-perfect-as-possible home isn't necessarily doing that dog any favors. When rescues take in dogs, they make a promise to that dog to find it a wonderful home where it will stay forever and always receive the utmost in attention and health care. Placing dogs in homes that are just okay may make space for more dogs, more quickly, but is the rescue doing the dog any long-term favors? -- Tara |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
These homes might not be the ideal home in some small respect but it would allow more dogs to be rescue rather than trying to find the optimal environment and facing the possibility that some will not be rescued due to lack of space. I disagree with the above. That's not to say that I think there's a such thing as a "perfect" home as each one is different in a great many aspects. However, placing a dog in a less than as-close-to-perfect-as-possible home isn't necessarily doing that dog any favors. When rescues take in dogs, they make a promise to that dog to find it a wonderful home where it will stay forever and always receive the utmost in attention and health care. Placing dogs in homes that are just okay may make space for more dogs, more quickly, but is the rescue doing the dog any long-term favors? The problem is one of definition - is my home any less better because I don't have a fensed in yard? According to some rescue groups, that would seem to be the case. This is what I meant by optimal conditions and is the point I'm trying to make. At what point does your search for the ideal conditions lead to fewer dogs being rescued? Also is our definition of a "wonderful home" so narrow that it disqualifies many who could otherwise provide a good home for the dog? Some people might have other advantages that could outweigh a potential negative such as a non- fenced in yard. That is the problem with absolutes - it fails to take into account all factors that constitute a good home. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|