If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
M I.5 Persec ution t he BBC, televisio n and rad io
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= the BBC, television and radio. -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made. what seemed to be a reaction to something which had. happened in my home, and out of context of what they were reading. My first reaction was. disbelief; nothing of. the sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a thing could occur had not crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt. of what had just taken place. My disbelief. eroded as this recurred time after time. Besides the news, offenders included shows such as. Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little moral. understanding among the people who make these programmes; they just. assume they will never be caught, so they carry on without a thought for. the illegality or amorality of what they do. The only time I ever heard. a word raised in doubt was by Paxman. being interviewed by someone else (I think by Clive Anderson) back in. 1990; referring to the "watching" he said it troubled him, and. when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well, you could. just switch it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand. in the way of continued surreptitious spying. from his own or other people's shows, though. Now you're convinced this is a troll, aren't you? This story has. been the subject of much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year,. and some readers believe it to be an invention (it has even. been suggested that a group of psychology students. are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of a derangement of the author, and a few. give it credence. Quite a few people do know part or all of the story already,. so this text will fill in the gaps in their knowledge. For. the rest, what may persuade you of the third possibility. is that some of the incidents detailed are checkable. against any archives of radio and TV programmes that exist; that the incidents involve named people (even if those hiding in. the shadows have not made their. identity or affiliations evident), and those people may be. persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign of harassment is continuing today both in the UK and on the. American continent, in a. none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to my face that harassment from. the TV was happening. On the first. day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local. pub with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me and said to. Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?". to which Phil replied, "Yes, I think. so". I. made a number of efforts to find the bugs, without success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people. to scan for bugs (see later) again without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed. of my TV and watched virtually. no television for the next three years. But harassment from TV stations has gone on for over six. years and continues to this day. This is something that. many people obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff have the morality of paedophiles, that because they're getting. away with it they feel no. wrong. Other people who were involved. in the abuse in 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably. disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations (see the following section). Again, since. they don't have sense in the first place they can't be expect to have. the moral sense not to be part of criminal harassment. 549 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M-I,5.Persec ution ` M I5 Ins ist th at these Fa xes m ust Contin ue | [email protected] | Dog behavior | 0 | December 31st 07 11:52 AM |
M I-5 Persec ution , M I5 Wa nt Me to Sen d Y ou th ese F axes | [email protected] | Dogs - general | 0 | December 31st 07 10:56 AM |
M`I'5.Persecut ion . T hree Year s of MI5 Persec ution Faxe s | [email protected] | Dogs - general | 0 | December 31st 07 10:16 AM |
M I-5,Persec ution Moles tation during T ravel | [email protected] | Dog breeds | 0 | December 31st 07 08:32 AM |