Are some livestock raised only for pet food?

On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!


You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.

On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-


Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-


Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly insist
they did.

On May 1, 5:23*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-

Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

* * It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly insist
they did.-

I don't think the Goober is capable of learning anything. He no doubt
thinks the choice cuts from the EXTRA livestock that he believes in
are hidden in the pet food somewhere. He just can't find them.

On Sun, 1 May 2011 23:45:40 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On May 1, 5:23*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-

Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

* * It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly insist
they did.-

I don't think the Goober is capable of learning anything.

Don't say stuff like that or you'll end up in the trap that Goo is in. We
all know that after years of us pointing out how stupid he was, the Goober
finally did learn that cows aren't raised for 12 years to become pet food. It's
true that if not for you and I, he and his boys would still believe it. But,
they did finally learn they were wrong, including Goo.

He no doubt
thinks the choice cuts from the EXTRA livestock that he believes in
are hidden in the pet food somewhere.

He must believe that, since it appears there's nothing else for him to
believe and he certainly hasn't said he believes anything different.

He just can't find them.

No, but I still suspect Goo really believes that he does know where they are
and may very well even think he has found them. Goo's just really afraid to tell
us where he thinks he did.

On 5/2/2011 4:19 PM, dh@. wrote:
[bad attempt at comedy]

Why don't you respond to my posts, boy?

On May 2, 5:19*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2011 23:45:40 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:





On May 1, 5:23*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-

Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

* * It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly insist
they did.-

I don't think the Goober is capable of learning anything.

* * Don't say stuff like that or you'll end up in the trap that Goo is in. We
all know that after years of us pointing out how stupid he was, the Goober
finally did learn that cows aren't raised for 12 years to become pet food.. It's
true that if not for you and I, he and his boys would still believe it. But,
they did finally learn they were wrong, including Goo.

He no doubt
thinks the choice cuts from the EXTRA livestock that he believes in
are hidden in the pet food somewhere.

* * He must believe that, since it appears there's nothing else for him to
believe and he certainly hasn't said he believes anything different.

He just can't find them.

* * No, but I still suspect Goo really believes that he does know where they are
and may very well even think he has found them. Goo's just really afraid to tell
us where he thinks he did.-


Maybe he's making an attempt at not outstupiding himself by keeping
his mouth shut on this one.

On Mon, 2 May 2011 23:40:05 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On May 2, 5:19*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2011 23:45:40 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On May 1, 5:23*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2:31*pm, Goo wrote:
****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:

****wit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton stuck his fist up his own ass:

[Douchebag's losing effort]

[****wit' losing effort]

Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.

* * *None are raised specifically to become pet food

Prove it.

LOL!!!

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-

Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

* * It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly insist
they did.-

I don't think the Goober is capable of learning anything.

* * Don't say stuff like that or you'll end up in the trap that Goo is in. We
all know that after years of us pointing out how stupid he was, the Goober
finally did learn that cows aren't raised for 12 years to become pet food. It's
true that if not for you and I, he and his boys would still believe it. But,
they did finally learn they were wrong, including Goo.

He no doubt
thinks the choice cuts from the EXTRA livestock that he believes in
are hidden in the pet food somewhere.

* * He must believe that, since it appears there's nothing else for him to
believe and he certainly hasn't said he believes anything different.

He just can't find them.

* * No, but I still suspect Goo really believes that he does know where they are
and may very well even think he has found them. Goo's just really afraid to tell
us where he thinks he did.-


Maybe he's making an attempt at not outstupiding himself by keeping
his mouth shut on this one.

Maybe he's trying but even if so Goo's still revealing how stupid he is for
not having any idea what it is he thinks he's trying to talk about, or that if
he thinks he does have some idea he's scared to let us know what he thinks it
is. Either way, Goo is once again in an impressively stupid and amusing
position.

On Mon, 02 May 2011 stupid Goo wrote:

On Mon, 02 May 2011 16:19:50 -0700, dh@. wrote:

On Sun, 1 May 2011 23:45:40 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On May 1, 5:23*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Apr 28, 7:03*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
are specifically raised to be pet food.

* * The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example of a
farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-

Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
pet food exists.

If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
telling us where the choice cuts wind up.

* * It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly insist
they did.-

I don't think the Goober is capable of learning anything.

Don't say stuff like that or you'll end up in the trap that Goo is in. We
all know that after years of us pointing out how stupid he was, the Goober
finally did learn that cows aren't raised for 12 years to become pet food. It's
true that if not for you and I, he and his boys would still believe it. But,
they did finally learn they were wrong, including Goo.

He no doubt
thinks the choice cuts from the EXTRA livestock that he believes in
are hidden in the pet food somewhere.

He must believe that, since it appears there's nothing else for him to
believe and he certainly hasn't said he believes anything different.

He just can't find them.

No, but I still suspect Goo really believes that he does know where they are
and may very well even think he has found them. Goo's just really afraid to tell
us where he thinks he did.

bad attempt at comedy

Goober since you're afraid to say what you think happens to the choice cuts
of the livestock you believe are raised for pet food, you're making other people
have to figure it out. You probably don't know what you believe Goo, but that
doesn't make it a whole lot more difficult for us, only for you. We are figuring
out what you think even though you're not sure. At this point it seems pretty
clear that you believe the choice cuts go into pet food along with the dead pets
and roadkill etc. So now the question is whether you believe they are ground up
and all mixed together, or if you believe that the choice cuts are separated to
different cans and correctly labeled and sold at a higher price than the stuff
made with by-products. I suspect you believe the latter Goo, and get the feeling
Mr Smartypants may have come to the same conclusion.

Why don't you respond to my posts, boy?

LOL! For one thing stupid Goo my parents are both dead, and for another my
father could appreciate when AW successfully provides lives of positive value
for livestock AND he didn't have respect for lying. He would be impressed but in
a most disgusted way, with you. You're pretending to be a man who would think of
you with contempt Goob. LOL....and my mother would too, Goo...LOL... You have
outstupidded yourself yet again Gooer.

On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:

On Thu, 05 May 2011 16:02:04 -0700, dh@. wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:29:07 -0700, Goo wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:52:58 -0700, dh@. wrote:

On Tue, 03 May 2011 10:52:26 -0700, Goo lied:

You are not promoting animal welfare

Goober I encourage people to appreciate when AW is successful, and you oppose
having appreciation and have manically been opposing it for over a decade
because and only because having appreciation works against elimination. Did you
somehow forget about that all of a sudden, Goob?

No.

Then it should be clear to you that I encourage decent AW and you argue in
favor of elimination instead, and part of the way you do that is by maniacally
opposing appreciation for AW successfully providing lives of positive value for
millions of livestock animals.

You do not encourage better animal welfare.

I have been encouraging appreciation for when it is successful, and you have
been opposing appreciation for when it is successful, for over a decade Goober.