A dog & canine forum. DogBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » DogBanter forum » Dog forums » Dog behavior
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stabbed Beast on the Loose...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 04, 07:06 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stabbed Beast on the Loose...

Jim Dauven,
You are a very unhappy person. Feel free to write to me (just hit
"write to") if you want to tell what is REALLY bothering you. Enjoying
slaughter is depraved, you know. As is revelling in profanity.
How did this happen to you? What pain has impelled you to this state?
Ultimately, we are what we make of ourselves, by what we do and by what
we think. Surely this is not the person you meant to become.
I am not "selling" religion -- only self-respect and respect for others.
Sincerely,
sister

  #2  
Old February 16th 04, 07:12 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is so sad, for all concerned, including the dog. And including the
negligent owner of the dog. I had a 2nd grader named Jeff, many years
ago, a wonderful boy, a sunshine boy, who entire face was torn off by a
rogue dog. Who knows why these tragic things happen? Not I. I still
feel horrified by that distant event.

  #3  
Old February 16th 04, 07:12 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is so sad, for all concerned, including the dog. And including the
negligent owner of the dog. I had a 2nd grader named Jeff, many years
ago, a wonderful boy, a sunshine boy, who entire face was torn off by a
rogue dog. Who knows why these tragic things happen? Not I. I still
feel horrified by that distant event.

  #4  
Old February 16th 04, 07:12 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is so sad, for all concerned, including the dog. And including the
negligent owner of the dog. I had a 2nd grader named Jeff, many years
ago, a wonderful boy, a sunshine boy, who entire face was torn off by a
rogue dog. Who knows why these tragic things happen? Not I. I still
feel horrified by that distant event.

  #5  
Old February 16th 04, 07:16 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To Greylock:
. . and so forth. See my earlier posts. I'll probably be back. You
too are invited to write to me if you want to become free and clear of
your animosity.
Sincerely,
sister

  #6  
Old February 16th 04, 07:16 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To Greylock:
. . and so forth. See my earlier posts. I'll probably be back. You
too are invited to write to me if you want to become free and clear of
your animosity.
Sincerely,
sister

  #7  
Old February 16th 04, 07:16 AM
Sister Kate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To Greylock:
. . and so forth. See my earlier posts. I'll probably be back. You
too are invited to write to me if you want to become free and clear of
your animosity.
Sincerely,
sister

  #8  
Old February 16th 04, 04:37 PM
*no spam*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm going to assume that the majority of dog attacks on humans happen
when the dog is off leash and away from its owner.

If that's the case, then, it seems like one solution is to make the
owners responsible for their dogs actions. There seems to be a debate
about to what degree this should apply.

How do people here feel about that as part of the solution to this
issue?
To what (reasonable) degree should it apply?

Greylock wrote in message . ..
Then if you want the breeds to continue, YOU need to get together with
other like minded - presumably responsible - dog owners and fight for
sanctions to make the vicious dog raisers find another line of work.

Owners of the "dangerous breeds" are going to have increasing problems
unless - and until - they make a common cause against the
irresponsible dog breeders.



On 15 Feb 2004 19:43:46 GMT, (Jeffrey C. Dege)
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:02 GMT, Greylock wrote:

If the dogs attacks continue, a ban on the breeds seen as dangerous is
likely to be the eventual result.


Yep. But it isn't likely to help, because the people who have decided
to raise vicious dogs will be able to do so, with another breed.

  #9  
Old February 16th 04, 04:37 PM
*no spam*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm going to assume that the majority of dog attacks on humans happen
when the dog is off leash and away from its owner.

If that's the case, then, it seems like one solution is to make the
owners responsible for their dogs actions. There seems to be a debate
about to what degree this should apply.

How do people here feel about that as part of the solution to this
issue?
To what (reasonable) degree should it apply?

Greylock wrote in message . ..
Then if you want the breeds to continue, YOU need to get together with
other like minded - presumably responsible - dog owners and fight for
sanctions to make the vicious dog raisers find another line of work.

Owners of the "dangerous breeds" are going to have increasing problems
unless - and until - they make a common cause against the
irresponsible dog breeders.



On 15 Feb 2004 19:43:46 GMT, (Jeffrey C. Dege)
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:02 GMT, Greylock wrote:

If the dogs attacks continue, a ban on the breeds seen as dangerous is
likely to be the eventual result.


Yep. But it isn't likely to help, because the people who have decided
to raise vicious dogs will be able to do so, with another breed.

  #10  
Old February 16th 04, 04:37 PM
*no spam*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm going to assume that the majority of dog attacks on humans happen
when the dog is off leash and away from its owner.

If that's the case, then, it seems like one solution is to make the
owners responsible for their dogs actions. There seems to be a debate
about to what degree this should apply.

How do people here feel about that as part of the solution to this
issue?
To what (reasonable) degree should it apply?

Greylock wrote in message . ..
Then if you want the breeds to continue, YOU need to get together with
other like minded - presumably responsible - dog owners and fight for
sanctions to make the vicious dog raisers find another line of work.

Owners of the "dangerous breeds" are going to have increasing problems
unless - and until - they make a common cause against the
irresponsible dog breeders.



On 15 Feb 2004 19:43:46 GMT, (Jeffrey C. Dege)
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:28:02 GMT, Greylock wrote:

If the dogs attacks continue, a ban on the breeds seen as dangerous is
likely to be the eventual result.


Yep. But it isn't likely to help, because the people who have decided
to raise vicious dogs will be able to do so, with another breed.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to treat dog's receding gums and loose teeth? [email protected] Dog health 5 December 22nd 04 02:44 PM
NO LOOSE ENDS STICKIN UP... FERSTAICH??? - Learning Curve - "drop it" voodoo Dog behavior 0 August 20th 03 06:26 AM
NO LOOSE ENDS STICKIN UP... FERSTAICH??? - Learning Curve - "drop it" voodoo Dog behavior 0 August 20th 03 06:26 AM
Opinions wanted... loose leash peejoe Dog behavior 14 August 3rd 03 02:17 PM
Opinions wanted... loose leash Tricia9999 Dog behavior 1 August 2nd 03 03:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 (Unauthorized Upgrade)
Copyright ©2004-2024 DogBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.