If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ping Tara
Okay, Tara, I found it. I can't find a way to respond to it without copying
and pasting (unless I want to get a google account, which is overkill to respond to one post). :} So I'll have to use the LCK method of attribution: Tara: I think you might be missing a good opportunity here Leah. While I agree that fundamentally it IS o.c., it might be worth your while to mentally suss out *why* the type that I described (and what Lee went on to discuss) only takes a minimal amount of reps....sometimes just one. If you keep getting stuck in explaining that it *is* o.c. (and, like I said, I think it counts as such as well) you're missing how you can *use* that information to (possibly) lessen the need for reps. You've said that it takes reps or the dog will lose a piece of information. Fair enough. But here you have the opportunity (as do I) to examine how to incorporate drive techniques into pet training to minimize that need. Leah: And that's what I'd like more information on - how to incorporate drive techniques into pet training. I don't often come across a dog who doesn't respond to either food, praise, or toys, but when I do, I'd certainly like to have another trick up my sleeve. I don't disagree that using a dog's natural drives could be powerful tool. But I'd need a whole lot more convincing that all other reinforcement is inadequate (which I know isn't what you're saying), or that it's a technique that could be easily translatable to JQP students who can't even use reward markers correctly. Tara: Working dog people have been using drive to each for years, so most of them have not too much need to learn this stuff, but pet obedience has been stuck in two categories for years- "motivational" (which really means discomfort based), or the new food based o.c. Leah: Which is motivational in itself. Tara: The thing is that many of us tend to give lip service to the fact that *many* things can be a motivator, but we rarely *use* those things. Food makes us look good as trainers, instantly. I can teach a lesson and have a puppy doing multiple backwards chained events within minutes....but that level of compliance rarely lasts past the lesson. Leah: True. I do have some students whose dogs will fairly reliably offer behaviors on the third trial, but that's not the norm. Hey, if I jump on this wood pile, I can get out of the fence! In other words, my behavior (jumping on the wood pile) will bring a reward (getting free to run and explore). It's powerful o.c., too, because the behavior brings exactly what the dog is focused on getting at the time. Tara: Sort of. Though again, I think you're spending so much time trying to prove that it *is* o.c. that you might be missing *why* it only takes one or two times. Isn't that more important as a trainer to find out? Leah: Yes. Which is why at one point I mentioned I may like to look at the Natural Dog Training book. Do you think there's any merit in it? Or are there better ways to learn? LCK: If something is important to a dog, he'll learn how to do it. Once he learns it, he learns it. The trick to getting him to "unlearn" it, is to give him a more emotionally satisfying replacement behavior. Leah: I don't disagree with this. However, I don't see how praise can be more emotionally satisfying than chasing the neighbor's cat. Tara: Well, I have some real problems with his argument. But I will respond to this one comment of yours. How is bringing the duck back to the hunter in exchange for some praise more emotionally satisfying than *eating* the duck? Leah: I don't know how retrievers are trained, but I'd say that somehow that praise has to be conditioned to be a primary reinforcer. Tara: I disagree with Lee saying he hadn't conditioned the praise. When asked about how he did that (I believe that chicken story as well as how to teach a dog to do that were in the discussion with suja about Pan) there was *plenty* of conditioning to the praise as bonding and a reinforcer and as a distractor. So I disagree with his premise that it alone had a major impact. Leah: What about the explanation of classical conditioning? In this case if the praise is used primarily as a distractor, and the timing is just right, you could change the dog's pattern of thinking from "dropped food on the floor, eat it" to "dropped food on the floor, go see daddy." Though I don't see how that could work in just one or two reps. Or for every dog. Canine Action Dog Trainer http://www.canineaction.com My Kids, My Students, My Life: http://hometown.aol.com/dfrntdrums/m...age/index.html Build Your Immune System, Lose Weight http://www.re-vita.net/dfrntdrums |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
shelly DETHRONES NESSA as MVP (Most Valuable Psychotic) of dog newsgroups!! | _michael 2.76 | Dog breeds | 0 | September 20th 04 01:28 AM |
shelly DETHRONES NESSA as MVP (Most Valuable Psychotic) of dog newsgroups!! | _michael 2.76 | Dog behavior | 0 | September 20th 04 01:28 AM |
shelly DETHRONES NESSA as MVP (Most Valuable Psychotic) of dog newsgroups!! | _michael 2.76 | Dog behavior | 0 | September 20th 04 01:28 AM |
Has anyone read . . | LeeCharlesKelley | Dog behavior | 2399 | September 12th 04 07:17 PM |