If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pit Bulls kill 6 year old girl.............
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4...0415&qs=1;bp=t.
You "dog loving feaks" read this one. How can you tell me this breed isn't trained to kill. ANOTHER story I have to post to educate the UNeducated (that wuold be you, stupid). I think you 'freaks' should put your kids in place of these innocent youngsters and see how it feels. "Not me" you say. Don't think you dog (or your neighbor's Pit Bull/Rottweiller will ever do this?) The clock is ticking. Just shows how selfish you are to put your kids/neighbors in jeapordy for the need of a stupid domestic animal like that. Some people like to be the "tough guy on the block" for their own reasons it seems. If I forgot to tell you freaks, don't waste your time e-mailing me with your crap. I do not read mail from unknown senders. Besides, you won't stop my crusade to preserve human life and educate people anyways. Let it go!! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael A. Ball" wrote in message
... On 5 Apr 2005 08:23:50 -0700, wrote: http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4...0415&qs=1;bp=t. You "dog loving feaks" read this one... You seem to have lost your mind, but I comment anyway. I'm saddened for this innocent little girl, and for the innocent dogs, but her family is going to be getting what they deserve. You are despicable. Her family, ie her mother since the father/husband is recently deceased, deserves the little girl's death because their dogs "broke loose" and mauled her? WTF kind of reasoning is that? They were, by implication, restrained and freed themselves from their restraints. Its also not known if either dog had ever shown any signs of being dangerous so the possibility of their breaking free, while obviously not a great thing, likely didn't present doom & gloom in anyone's eyes. To say that the family deserved what happened is ludicrous and I'm not entirely sure I agree with the "innocent dogs" part either. -- Tara |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:36:19 -0400, "Tee"
wrote: You are despicable. ... To say that the family deserved what happened is ludicrous and I'm not entirely sure I agree with the "innocent dogs" part either. "Despicable"? Imagine that! This "mother" knowingly quartered two pit bulls which, due to genetics and/or lack of training, et cetera, were obviously very dangerous. She failed to adequately confine them, and she failed to provide adequate safety for her daughter. I hope the mother gets prosecuted on ever charge the DA can bring. Dog owners like this deserve justice! As for the deceased father, considering the child's age and the sort of dogs her parents kept, there's a fair chance his death was drug related. And even if the man was a saint, he was still an irresponsible dog owner. Dogs don't make moral or ethical decisions: they follow their instincts. So, I don't see how they could be anything, but innocent. "Despicable". LOL One jihad Mom to another Jihad Mom: "sigh"Kids"..." They blow up so quickly!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael A. Ball" wrote in message
... On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:36:19 -0400, "Tee" wrote: You are despicable. ... To say that the family deserved what happened is ludicrous and I'm not entirely sure I agree with the "innocent dogs" part either. "Despicable"? Imagine that! This "mother" knowingly quartered two pit bulls which, due to genetics and/or lack of training, et cetera, were obviously very dangerous. There's no "obviously" about it. Until you receive information that the dogs had a history of unprovoked aggression you can't hold the mother responsible for harboring dangerous dogs. She failed to adequately confine them, We don't know that the confinement was secure and that for some reason, maybe people helping them to move, an oversight occurred giving the dogs a way out. Then again dogs have a way of getting out of anything that isn't secured all the way around so who knows? Not us at this point. and she failed to provide adequate safety for her daughter. How so? Because her dogs escaped? If the dogs had no history of violence and she thought they were secured, not to mention that the dogs lived at the same residence this child grew up in (therefore the child was familiar), then how did she fail? It may turn out that the dogs were a known threat but until that information comes out the article itself stands and there's nothing to support your rantings. I hope the mother gets prosecuted on ever charge the DA can bring. Dog owners like this deserve justice! I hope you get the therapy you need. As for the deceased father, considering the child's age and the sort of dogs her parents kept, there's a fair chance his death was drug related. And even if the man was a saint, he was still an irresponsible dog owner. Simply because he owned a Pit Bull, sorry *two* Pit Bulls? Its also likely, given his breed of choice, that he either od'd or was gun-down over a drug deal gone bad? There's more than one newsgroup regular who has multiple Pit Bulls, are they into the drug scene & asking for a child's death due to that? Dogs don't make moral or ethical decisions: they follow their instincts. So, I don't see how they could be anything, but innocent. They did the deed, weren't coerced into it, and there's nothing in the article to suggest they were poorly raised. Innocent in terms of not being prosecutable but they *did* do the deed. "Despicable". LOL Its nothing to laugh about. -- Tara |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"diddy" diddy@rohada.com
wrote in message ... in thread : "Tee" whittled the following words: How so? Because her dogs escaped? If the dogs had no history of violence and she thought they were secured, not to mention that the dogs lived at the same residence this child grew up in (therefore the child was familiar), then how did she fail? If those dogs have no previous violent histories, it only gives creedence to the PIT BULL comes of age, and then *Snaps* theory. And makes you understand all the more why they should be outlawed. Not necessarily, the dogs may be too old, or even too young, for the coming of age. I don't think its a myth that their dog aggression, if they are predisposed to have it, kicks in around a certain time but, to my knowledge, there's no "they turn on and go after people" timeline. Seriously, they could've been headcases. They could have been raised poorly. They could have been perfect angels who were raised well with no prior indications of aggression. We don't know any of that information. However, suddenly turning on a person, particularly a child, is something that can happen with any dog of any breed at any time. There are so many breeds out there more unpredictable with children than Pit Bulls. There are also many dogs out there who, for whatever reason, one day become unpredictable with children and/or adults for seemingly no reason. The Pit Bull problem, IMO, lies in the severity of damage they do, especially when its a pack combo, not in some kind of predisposition towards child eating. But I don't think that's a good enough reason to ban them. -- Tara |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:05:18 -0400, "Tee"
wrote: ... It seems strange to at odds with you. I'm not going to waste our time. I'm not particularly fond of pit bulls, and I like children even less, but the child and the dogs are the only victims I see in this case. We can discuss mitigating circumstance, and "what if" scenarios indefinitely. However, I can't think of anything that diminishes our responsibility to protect all others from our possessions. The dead child's parents failed to provide that protection--for the one who most deserved protecting. Whatever it takes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4...0415&qs=1;bp=t. You "dog loving feaks" read this one. How can you tell me this breed isn't trained to kill. ANOTHER story I have to post to educate the UNeducated (that wuold be you, stupid). I think you 'freaks' should put your kids in place of these innocent youngsters and see how it feels. "Not me" you say. Don't think you dog (or your neighbor's Pit Bull/Rottweiller will ever do this?) The clock is ticking. Just shows how selfish you are to put your kids/neighbors in jeapordy for the need of a stupid domestic animal like that. Some people like to be the "tough guy on the block" for their own reasons it seems. If I forgot to tell you freaks, don't waste your time e-mailing me with your crap. I do not read mail from unknown senders. Besides, you won't stop my crusade to preserve human life and educate people anyways. Let it go!! I resent that Rottweiller reference. I recently posted about how my Rottweiller adores every man, woman, child, and dog it comes across. It is not even a good protective dog. You sir don't understand dogs and the particular temperament which is largely dependent on the owner. -Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4...0415&qs=1;bp=t. You "dog loving feaks" read this one. How can you tell me this breed isn't trained to kill. ANOTHER story I have to post to educate the UNeducated (that wuold be you, stupid). I think you 'freaks' should put your kids in place of these innocent youngsters and see how it feels. "Not me" you say. Don't think you dog (or your neighbor's Pit Bull/Rottweiller will ever do this?) The clock is ticking. Just shows how selfish you are to put your kids/neighbors in jeapordy for the need of a stupid domestic animal like that. Some people like to be the "tough guy on the block" for their own reasons it seems. If I forgot to tell you freaks, don't waste your time e-mailing me with your crap. I do not read mail from unknown senders. Besides, you won't stop my crusade to preserve human life and educate people anyways. Let it go!! ========================================== First off, does anyone have any pictures of these dogs?? Chances are they were labelled 'pit bulls' which is not a breed but a type of dog. There are hundreds of breeds that can fit into that group. Secondly, 'us freaks' are mostly responsible and wouldn't think of putting our children in a situation like that. Our dogs are not chained up without socialization, and in my neighbourhood, I'm the one that bites children when they toss rocks at someone's car or bark at the neighbour's dog or drags sticks down the neighbour's picket fence or knock down garbage cans with their bikes or beat up mailboxes with baseball bats. Talk about stupid domestic beings - my dogs are way more intelligent than the parents of those kids or the parents of the poor child that was mauled by THEIR family dogs. You want to crusade - go for it. Preserving human life is great. But when you are EDUCATING, try to remember that all dogs bite, some harder than others, some more often than others and ALL because of the owners not being 'responsible'. These people obviously learned a lesson the hard way. "United We Stand." http://www.bannedaid.com/ ================================ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Urgent-1 year old female Dalmation NEEDING RESCUED IMMEDIATELY | jvigil98 | Dog rescue | 4 | November 26th 03 09:19 AM |
Pure Bred 1 year old Female Dalmation needs URGENT RESCUE | jvigil98 | Dog breeds | 1 | November 25th 03 03:39 AM |
Urgent-1 year old female Dalmation NEEDING RESCUED IMMEDIATELY | jvigil98 | Dog rescue | 0 | November 24th 03 07:58 AM |
Urgent-1 year old female Dalmation NEEDING RESCUED IMMEDIATELY | jvigil98 | Dog rescue | 0 | November 24th 03 07:58 AM |
Urgent-1 year old female Dalmation NEEDING RESCUED IMMEDIATELY | jvigil98 | Dog rescue | 0 | November 24th 03 07:58 AM |