If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RPDB stats
on 2005-06-15 at 08:25 wrote:
This month's top posters 110 interestingly, Google only returns a total of 39 hits for me in *all* groups i've posted to. nineteen were in *breeds, 16 were in *behavior, one in *health, and three in ARK. what was your point, anyway? -- shelly http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/ http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
on 2005-06-15 at 08:43 wrote:
You honestly think you only posted 39 times in ALL groups? that's what i get when Googling on my address. i don't know why there's such a huge discrepancy between the two numbers. and, FWIW, Googling on other posters email addresses shows markedly lower numbers than those on Google's stats page. http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq =&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=scouv rette%40bluemarble.net&lr=&as_qdr=&as_drrb=b&as_mi nd=1&as_minm=6&as_miny=2005&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=6&a s_maxy=2005&safe=off or http://tinyurl.com/7e465 BTW, I got it off google. And I had no point. it's about this group. I found it interesting you had to have had a point, or you wouldn't have looked it up or posted it. or, do you make a habit of going around doing random, pointless things? I just think it's either funny or sad that you are so obsessive compulsive that you have to post a comment on EVERYTHING, including stats. i'm sorry, i didn't realize i wasn't allowed to comment. what funny and/or sad is that you have such a bee in your bonnet that you felt the need to look up the stats and post them in the first place. In fact, you posted more than the second and third posters combined. INCLUDING the PW. IDTS. interestingly, we'll never know how frequently *you* post, as you do not allow your posts to be archived. however, for the posts that have not fallen off Google yet, you are pretty much i a dead heat with me: http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=author%3Adiddy %40nospam.diddy.net&safe=off&qt_s=Search&as_drrb=b &as_mind=1&as_minm=6&as_miny=2005&as_maxd=15&as_ma xm=6&as_maxy=2005 or http://tinyurl.com/bamst lololololololol!!!1!! -- shelly http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/ http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
diddy wrote: In fact, you posted more than the second and third posters combined. INCLUDING the PW. There really is a discrepancy in the numbers. If you do an author search for shelly's posts to rec.pets.dogs.breeds since 1 June, you get 46 hits. If you do a search for posts since 15 May you get 127 hits and if you do a search for posts since 16 May you get 117, both of which are closer to what the "about" report shows but neither matches. Getting an accurate post count should not be a difficult problem. How do you account for the difference in the numbers? -- Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - 43% of all private-sector jobs created in the US from 2001 to April 2005 are housing-related |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
on 2005-06-15 at 09:54 wrote:
There really is a discrepancy in the numbers. If you do an author search for shelly's posts to rec.pets.dogs.breeds since 1 June, you get 46 hits. i'm getting 39 total hits for June 1-June 15. http://tinyurl.com/cktcr i wonder what accounts for *that* discrepancy? not that it matters. the stats are clearly screwed up no matter how you slice it. If you do a search for posts since 15 May you get 127 hits i get 74! http://tinyurl.com/9qt6u and if you do a search for posts since 16 May you get 117, i get 71. still an inexplicable shrinkage, but also, still, not the same number you're getting. http://tinyurl.com/exfta How do you account for the difference in the numbers? clearly, i'm doing something to manipulate the numbers. or, equally likely, i spend 24/7 sitting naked i front of my computer, posting while i rock back and forth, drool, and cackle maniacally. it's a pretty good gig if you can get it. -- shelly http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/ http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
diddy wrote: i assumed the search i did, was for actual posts to that group. i think the google search shelly did was for threads posted to. My best guess anyhow. That has nothing to do with what I posted about the discrepancy in the number of posts by author based on the contents of the "From:" header. There's a mismatch, which suggests very strongly that the numbers being reported are unreliable. -- Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - 43% of all private-sector jobs created in the US from 2001 to April 2005 are housing-related |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article e.net,
shelly wrote: i'm getting 39 total hits for June 1-June 15. That's for all newsgroups, rather than just rec.pets.dogs.breeds or rec.pets.dogs.behavior. -- Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - 43% of all private-sector jobs created in the US from 2001 to April 2005 are housing-related |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
on 2005-06-15 at 09:01 wrote:
i assumed the search i did, was for actual posts to that group. i think the google search shelly did was for threads posted to. My best guess anyhow. you assumed incorrectly. -- shelly http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/ http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
on 2005-06-15 at 09:00 wrote:
Thats in ALL groups. as was the search i did on myself. and that's 40 posts. And do you REALLY think i post as much as you? apparently, you do. i say apparently, because i think it's pretty clear that Google's numbers are unreliable. -- shelly http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/ http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
on 2005-06-15 at 10:15 wrote:
In article e.net, shelly wrote: i'm getting 39 total hits for June 1-June 15. That's for all newsgroups, rather than just rec.pets.dogs.breeds or rec.pets.dogs.behavior. exactly! according to your search and Google's group stats, i posted more to individual groups than i did in total. clearly, that's not possible. -- shelly http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/ http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article e.net,
shelly wrote: exactly! according to your search and Google's group stats, i posted more to individual groups than i did in total. clearly, that's not possible. Well, the *important* thing is that it gives Diddy an excuse to do a middle-aged version of following you around and pulling your pigtails. -- Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - 43% of all private-sector jobs created in the US from 2001 to April 2005 are housing-related |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OT] The 2005 RPDB Quilt | Rocky | Dog behavior | 0 | February 1st 05 12:22 AM |
rpdb name that dog game | Marcel Beaudoin | Dog behavior | 0 | September 3rd 04 01:14 PM |
Where's the rpdb Barf Bag? | Judy | Dog behavior | 0 | August 28th 04 09:07 PM |
Where's the rpdb Barf Bag? | Judy | Dog behavior | 0 | August 28th 04 09:07 PM |
Breed Stats So Far | Leah | Dog behavior | 28 | July 16th 03 01:52 PM |