On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:09:24 GMT, John Wesley wrote:

In article .com,
says...
Yeah. We was just talkin abHOWET shock and pronged
spiked pinch choke collars and aversive sprays.

I wish somebody would put a spiked pinch collar on you and a muzzle on
your MOUTH.

PLONK...

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ My response:
In article .com,
says...
Jerry you old fart...

On 1-6-06, you responded, "I think most everyone has him filtered. It makes for much
nicer reading."

You've realized, for more than a week, that no one wants to read Jerry Howe's comments, or
any post that quotes him; yet, you do just that.

Folks in dog related news groups typically disagree about all sorts of things. However,
the one thing about which there is nearly 100% accord is the fact that no one is
interested in seeing anything related to Jerry Howe. Falling prey to him, you become
troll-like, and subject to being "kill filed" or filtered out. If you want to be read,
don't write about Jerry Howe. It is your choice.


School - Four walls with tomorrow inside.