If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Finding our way through the quagmire of theories
Hello all,
As someone new to this newsgroup, and relatively inexperienced in bringing up dogs, I just wanted to muse for a moment or two on how bewildering it can be for us mere mortals to know what's right and what's not. There seem to be so many approaches and theories - many of which seem to be explained in ways that make sense, but many of which are very different from one another. There are those that say that we have to think and act like the head of the pack, and that that's how our dogs will see us and treat us if we do it properly. But even amongst the people who say that, there are some who say that we should use discipline and corrections in much the same way that the pack leader would use it, imitating growling, staring the dog down when it steps out of line, even maybe a smack across the nose. Then there are others who, while saying we need to behave like pack leaders, say we shouldn't use punishment at all - but should imitate the pack leader in other ways, such as always eating first, keeping our dogs physically below us, and so on. Then there are still others who say that dogs don't see us as dogs at all, that they know we're different to them and we should not attempt to act like pack leaders but rather train them only through rewards and never through trying to be the dominant one. I find all of these approaches and theories seem to make some sense when I think about them, and while I can and do try to do a little bit of all of them to a degree, there are some points where they are just plain contradictory, and so I then worry that I might be doing the wrong thing. Sorry to go on about it - and obviously there's no absolute undisputed way of knowing what's right and what's not. But I did wonder if anyone has ever seen any really objective comparison of different techniques, or anything that might help poor lost souls like myself find their way? Many thanks for any thoughts, Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Finding our way through the quagmire of theories
dogs do have different personalities... and you have to use a variety of
methods to train... the books only tell you really how to train yourself to train a dog you want to own... one that you can live with... oh wait i should correct myself a bit here... the GOOD books... only ... using violence, and I mean that in a very minor way, doesn't work unless you do it in a very imitating way to a very young pup where you would imitate the way a mother may disicpline her dog... shaking the scruff, grabbing and putting down quickly... but these also only work until the age of 2-3 months... by the time you get your puppy, it will have already *hopefully with rare exceptions* have already learned as much as it can from its mother.... and anything that a mother dog would do for dicipline, would NOT injure the pup, but startle and put it in its place... as in many cases of pups and children... the behaviour is suddenly out the brain and a new behaviour may enter the brain.... it could be the same behaviour... *G*... so in general... not a good thing... you have to be careful to not do something to 'increase' or worsen the behaviour... learn dog language and what they are saying to you... the whole "I konw I did somethingbad and I feel bad" look with the head down and ears back/down doesn't mean that... it means I was just doing something that the owner b arks about and now I have to give the owner calming signals and leave the room so I don't get barked at... one example... as I'm thinking of my dog getting into the butter look... smack accross the nose would generally never be used by any reputable trainer... positive reenforcement is used for the most part... treats, happy talk etc... I have had some advice for more hands on not so friendly training, but not totally negative training either ... saying "hey" loudly, putting the dog down quickly, grabbing the dog and telling it no/hey quickly catching the behaviour in motion. *humping was this particular behaviour* and not my dog... I use hey when my dog starts to pull on the leash andshe knows automatically that I have a treat that she'll get as she gets back beside me during walks... pack leader mentality... pending on breed... most dogs think alike, and just holding the dog down on its side or its backside till it gives in to you is usually a good thing... you have to be able to handle your dog without it fighting you, or biting, or scratching etc... you don't want to break the dog though, just train it... I love how my dog won't give up, ever... when she tried to dominate my boyfriend for the first time he had to hold her down for about 90 minutes before she actually gave up and let him hold her down... then she could get up... but she never dominated him again, and she still won't give up when she is helping me with my sons seizures... so yeah I think I digressed a bit from my origional post of just wanting to say various dogs, various personalities, same thinking mentality... a lahso apso, has the same thoughts going through its brain as a great dane... but why would you allow one to bite and the other not to? bad training on one part, responsible training on another... do what works for you, most of what people offer here is advice, and not all advice is complete, but check out puppy trainers in your area, and go to one you really enjoy their style of... if you think something they are doing is wrong, inquire as to why they are doing it... if the answer suffices you, there you go... in general... dog training is fun... a LOT of fun... and I highly recommend the pennies in a can approach with positive reenforcement... *doesn't work for bunnies.... its just a new thing to play with...* "Ian P" wrote in message ... Hello all, As someone new to this newsgroup, and relatively inexperienced in bringing up dogs, I just wanted to muse for a moment or two on how bewildering it can be for us mere mortals to know what's right and what's not. There seem to be so many approaches and theories - many of which seem to be explained in ways that make sense, but many of which are very different from one another. There are those that say that we have to think and act like the head of the pack, and that that's how our dogs will see us and treat us if we do it properly. But even amongst the people who say that, there are some who say that we should use discipline and corrections in much the same way that the pack leader would use it, imitating growling, staring the dog down when it steps out of line, even maybe a smack across the nose. Then there are others who, while saying we need to behave like pack leaders, say we shouldn't use punishment at all - but should imitate the pack leader in other ways, such as always eating first, keeping our dogs physically below us, and so on. Then there are still others who say that dogs don't see us as dogs at all, that they know we're different to them and we should not attempt to act like pack leaders but rather train them only through rewards and never through trying to be the dominant one. I find all of these approaches and theories seem to make some sense when I think about them, and while I can and do try to do a little bit of all of them to a degree, there are some points where they are just plain contradictory, and so I then worry that I might be doing the wrong thing. Sorry to go on about it - and obviously there's no absolute undisputed way of knowing what's right and what's not. But I did wonder if anyone has ever seen any really objective comparison of different techniques, or anything that might help poor lost souls like myself find their way? Many thanks for any thoughts, Ian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Finding our way through the quagmire of theories
Ian P wrote: I find all of these approaches and theories seem to make some sense when I think about them, and while I can and do try to do a little bit of all of them to a degree, there are some points where they are just plain contradictory, and so I then worry that I might be doing the wrong thing. Can you think of one single area in life where all the experts, wanna-be experts and involved amateurs agree on everything? I can't. People have different experiences by which to approach things, and many approaches can work. But they won't necessarily all work together. So, if you "try to do a little bit of all of them to a degree", not only will you make yourself crazy, but worse, you will make your dog crazy. First thing to do is research and find out what ideas resonate with your own experience. Form a training philosophy and look for the ideas which work and fit with it. What you will do, what you won't do, what you would only do in certain situations. Look for knowledgable people whose approach fits your philosophy. And if at any point, your gut tells you "this is wrong" believe yourself. If you're uneasy with a technique, you aren't going to use it well, even if the theory behind it is solid. And keep your mind open. Training philosophies can change dramatically with new information and new experience. Growth is good My theory about dog training is that it is very simple (as opposed to very easy). Dogs do what works. If something works for them, they'll try it again. If they test it and find out that it never works, they'll give it up (possibly not without an extinction burst). Our job as dog trainers is to make the things we like "work" and the things we don't like "not work." That may involve offering reinforcement. It may involve punishment. It will probably involve some management. And it will require that at least some of the time you are able to be smarter than your dog. BroomSandy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Finding our way through the quagmire of theories
"Ian P" wrote in message ... Hello all, As someone new to this newsgroup, and relatively inexperienced in bringing up dogs, I just wanted to muse for a moment or two on how bewildering it can be for us mere mortals to know what's right and what's not. Once again, many thanks to everyone for your thoughts and advice. It's very much appreciated. I think I'm getting the hang of it all now. In any event, the two little puppies seem very happy, are pretty well behaved and, more times than not, do what I tell them to ... so something seems to be working. Thanks again for your advice and insights. It really is very much appreciated!! Ian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Finding our way through the quagmire of theories
Human_And_Animal_Behavior_Forensic_Sciences_Resear wrote: HOWEDY ian p, "Ian P" wrote in message ... Hello all, As someone new to this newsgroup, NOT EXXXACTLY NEW, ian p. You been readin these muggers for months pryor to gettin your puppys AND, you GOT your JUST DESSERTS, didn't you, ian p {}: ~ ( and relatively inexperienced in bringing up dogs, ONLY LIARS, DOG, CHILD and SP-HOWES abusers post here abHOWETS, ian p {}: ~ ( I just wanted to muse for a moment or two The Sincerely Incredibly Freakin Insanely Simply Amazing Grand Puppy, Child, Pussy, Birdy And Horsey Wizard been TELLIN YOU for months NHOWE, ian p. You CHOSE to DISREGARD the SCIENTIFIC and CASE HISTORY DATA. No, he chooses to ignore a child molesting fool who has no idea what he's talking about. Wouldn't you ignore such a person? Oh - maybe not - since you don't have a brain, AssHowe. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Finding our way through the quagmire of theories [jerry]
Human_And_Animal_Behaviour_Forensic_Sciences_Resea wrote: HOWEDY mikey aka pat aka unsurreality you pathteic miserable stinkin lyin animal child an spHOWES abusin punk thug coward active acute chronic life long incurable mental case and dog trainin FRAUD an SCAM ARTIST, wrote: Human_And_Animal_Behavior_Forensic_Sciences_Resear wrote: HOWEDY ian p, "Ian P" wrote in message ... Hello all, As someone new to this newsgroup, NOT EXXXACTLY NEW, ian p. You been readin these muggers for months pryor to gettin your puppys AND, you GOT your JUST DESSERTS, didn't you, ian p {}: ~ ( and relatively inexperienced in bringing up dogs, ONLY LIARS, DOG, CHILD and SP-HOWES abusers post here abHOWETS, ian p {}: ~ ( I just wanted to muse for a moment or two The Sincerely Incredibly Freakin Insanely Simply Amazing Grand Puppy, Child, Pussy, Birdy And Horsey Wizard been TELLIN YOU for months NHOWE, ian p. You CHOSE to DISREGARD the SCIENTIFIC and CASE HISTORY DATA. No, he chooses to ignore a child molesting fool You sez you got The Sincerely Incredibly Freakin Insanely Simply Amazing Grand Puppy, Child, Pussy, Birdy And Horsey Wizard's child molesting COURT RECORDS. HOWE COME you DON'T POST THEM HERE, mikey? Umm - you're so ignorant it's crazy. My lawyer told me not to, AssHowe. who has no idea what he's talking about. We was talkin abHOWET ian p bein a dog abusin punk thug coward and PROBABLY LIFE LONG INCURABLE MENTAL CASE like yourself and your punk thug coward pals here abHOWETS. Yeah yeah - everyone is a mental case except you, AssHowe. SURE. YOU are the ONLY mental case and coward here. When are we going to meet, AssHowe? Are you SCARED??? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help with finding a home for our dog -Raleigh/Durham NC | [email protected] | Dog rescue | 1 | August 6th 06 07:02 PM |
My experiences with finding the right dog | Rich Spencer | Dog rescue | 68 | November 24th 03 05:00 AM |
My experiences with finding the right dog | Rich Spencer | Dog breeds | 19 | October 17th 03 12:11 PM |
My experiences with finding the right dog | Rich Spencer | Dog rescue | 0 | October 13th 03 02:25 AM |
My experiences with finding the right dog | Rich Spencer | Dog rescue | 0 | October 13th 03 02:25 AM |