If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
M I.5,Persecutio n , the BBC, t elevision an d rad io
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= the BBC, television and radio. -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident in June 1990 was when a. BBC newsreader made what seemed to be a reaction to something which had. happened in my home, and out of context of what they were. reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing of the sort had ever happened. before, the idea that such a thing could occur. had not crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt of what had just taken place. My disbelief eroded as this recurred time after. time. Besides the news, offenders included shows such as. Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little moral. understanding among the people who. make these programmes; they just assume they will never be. caught, so they carry on without a thought for the illegality or amorality of what they do. The only time I ever heard a word. raised in doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone else (I think by. Clive Anderson) back in 1990; referring to the. "watching" he said it troubled him, and when asked by the host what you could do about. it, replied "Well, you could just switch it off". (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand in the way of. continued surreptitious spying from his own. or other people's shows, though. Now you're convinced this is a troll, aren't you? This story has been. the subject of much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over. a year, and some readers believe it to be an. invention (it has even been suggested that a group of psychology. students are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of a derangement of the. author, and a few give it credence. Quite a few. people do know part or all of the story already, so this text will fill in the gaps. in their knowledge. For the rest, what may persuade you. of the third possibility is that some of the incidents detailed are checkable against any archives. of radio and TV programmes that exist; that the incidents. involve named people (even if those hiding in the shadows have not. made their identity or affiliations evident), and those people may be persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign. of harassment is continuing. today both in the UK and on the American continent, in a. none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to my face that harassment from. the TV was happening. On the first. day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local. pub with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee.. Ian made a few references to me and said to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied,. "Yes, I think. so". I made a number of. efforts to find the bugs, without success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people to scan for bugs. (see later) again without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed of my TV. and watched virtually no television for the next three years.. But harassment from TV stations has gone on for over six years and. continues to this day. This is something that. many people obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff have. the morality of paedophiles, that because they're getting away with it they feel no. wrong. Other people who were involved in the. abuse in 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other. stations (see the following section). Again, since they don't have. sense in the first place they can't be expect to have the moral sense not. to be part of criminal harassment. 548 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M.I,5`Persecutio n ` how an d why did it st art? | [email protected] | Dogs - general | 0 | January 1st 08 11:17 AM |
M.I,5`Persecutio n ` how an d why did it st art? | [email protected] | Dog rescue | 0 | January 1st 08 11:17 AM |
M I.5,Persecutio n , the BBC, t elevision an d rad io | [email protected] | Dog health | 0 | January 1st 08 09:28 AM |
M I.5,Persecutio n , the BBC, t elevision an d rad io | [email protected] | Dog breeds | 0 | January 1st 08 09:28 AM |
M`I,5-Persecutio n . M I5 W ant Me to Se nd You t hese Faxe s | [email protected] | Dog breeds | 0 | December 31st 07 12:14 PM |