A dog & canine forum. DogBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » DogBanter forum » Dog forums » Dogs - general
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

M`I 5`Persecut ion . w hy t he se curity service s?

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 2nd 08, 10:02 AM posted to rec.pets.dogs.misc,rec.pets.dogs.rescue,rec.pets.herp,rec.photo,rec.photo.darkroom
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 2
Default M`I 5`Persecut ion . w hy t he se curity service s?

-= why. the security services? -=

You may ask, why do I think the "they" referred to. are the security
services? Is. there any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if. there
is a. single source, is there any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working. for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of a single source versus something. more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that there. is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out. Since things have been repeated verbatim. which were
said in my home, there must be one group which does. the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during. travel) people have
been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what they were. to say, it
follows that someone must have. done the planning for that, and again a
single source. is indicated.

b) So why couldn't it be amateurs?. Why couldn't it be a private
organisation, for example a private detective. agency paid to manage the
campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective. agencies are
unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in the. past when they've
been exposed or caught; they too can have access to the. bugging technology
deployed; and there are. reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes to do
their dirty work (against peace campaigners and similar enemies. of the
state) on the understanding that if. they were caught then they could deny
all knowledge.. Why couldn't that be the case?

The main. factor pointing to direct security service involvement (as opposed
to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access. to the media in
particular, and the fact that the television companies are so involved. in
the. campaign. The BBC would not directly invade someone's home themselves,
since it would not be within their remit to allocate personnel or. financial
resources to do so. An organisation. of their stature would not take part in
a campaign set up by private sources. The only people. they would take
material from would be the. security services, presumably on the assumption
that if the cat ever flew out of. the bag yowling it would be MI5 who would
take. the consequences.

State sponsorship for. these acts of psychological terrorism is also
indicated by duration;. support for over six years for a team of three or
four people would be. beyond the means and will of most private sources.
The viciousness of the slanders and personal. denigration also points to
MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British state from politicians of. the
wrong hue by character. assassination, and in this case are using their
tried and tested methods to murder with words an enemy they have. invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents. Diana and Hewitt were alleged to. have been filmed
"at it" by. an Army intelligence team which had operated in Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who had. been
on the team. His statements were. denied by the defence establishment who
tried to. character-assassinate by describing him as the "Jones twins".
Funny how if you tell the truth, then you. must be ill, isn't it? Thought
only communists behaved like. that?

Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to. by someone in the army who
revealed the existence of videotapes of him and Diana, and. that the tapes
would be published. if any attempt was made by them to resume their



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M,I`5,Persecut ion th eir metho ds an d ta ctics [email protected] Dogs - general 0 January 1st 08 04:07 PM
M,I`5,Persecut ion th eir metho ds an d ta ctics [email protected] Dog rescue 0 January 1st 08 04:07 PM
M`I 5`Persecut ion . a buse in set-u p si tuations a nd in publ ic [email protected] Dog behavior 0 January 1st 08 02:40 PM
M`I 5.Persecut ion . MI 5 W ant Me to Se nd Y ou these Faxe s [email protected] Dog behavior 0 December 31st 07 11:11 AM
M`I 5.Persecut ion . MI 5 W ant Me to Se nd Yo u thes e F axes [email protected] Dog rescue 0 December 31st 07 11:03 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 (Unregistered)
Copyright 2004-2019 DogBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.