Subject: Can I just attach a Pic?
From: Handsome Jack Morrison

Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2003 6:56 PM
Message-id:

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:11:52 -0400, "sionnach"
wrote:

"Kind2dogs" wrote:

NOT ONCE was he anything more than a gentleman to me, so to me he was
a
good guy.

Well, he was just about the *opposite* of "gentleman" to many other
people-

In my recollection of dogman, he was always a perfect gentleman with
ladies.

That is my recollection of him as well.

But if someone didn't behave like a lady, she was likely to be treated
accordingly.

Yup

E.g., katy bar the door.

especially newbies and any woman who disagreed with him about
anything.

No, I don't remember it having anything to do with women or newbies.

Me either.

In fact he had many heated rants with guys.

remember the one from Canada and something to do with the ministry of health?


Or whether anyone disagreed with him, either.

He mostly treated people the same way they treated him, whether they
agreed with him or not.

Yup and NOT A BAD WAY TO BE!

I'm like that too,

Maybe that's why we got along.

Now you may not agree with that way to live
your life, but it ain't a bad way, at least not in my opinion.

Nor mine.


A man who calls any female who dares to disagree with or
contradict him a "****"

Well, again, my memory might be a little hazy, but I don't remember
dogman ever calling anyone a **** who didn't deserve it.

I don't like it at all ,no matter. However I have e never been much for
vulgarity.

But I wasn't
always around in those days.

How come?

Where were you?

And what brought you back here now?


And considering how I've been treated here myself at times, yes, by
the local piranha, it's quite understandable.

(along with other nasty names)

Yeah, ol' dogman was pretty doggone good at that.

The Maestro, in fact.

But hey, no one's perfect.

I am ; )

Handsome JAck, WHY do you not want to be archived?

Paulette~

In article ,
Kind2dogs wrote:
He mostly treated people the same way they treated him, whether they
agreed with him or not.
Yup and NOT A BAD WAY TO BE!

I think it's a fabulously stupid way to be ("an eye for an
eye and the whole world is blind"). Nobody can force me to
treat them badly and if I do treat someone badly it's
nobody's fault but my own. It's a question of personal
responsibility.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?

In article ,
Kind2dogs wrote:
He mostly treated people the same way they treated him, whether they
agreed with him or not.
Yup and NOT A BAD WAY TO BE!

I think it's a fabulously stupid way to be ("an eye for an
eye and the whole world is blind"). Nobody can force me to
treat them badly and if I do treat someone badly it's
nobody's fault but my own. It's a question of personal
responsibility.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?

Subject: Can I just attach a Pic?
From: (Melinda Shore)
Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2003 7:42 PM
Message-id:

In article ,
Kind2dogs wrote:
He mostly treated people the same way they treated him, whether they
agreed with him or not.
Yup and NOT A BAD WAY TO BE!

I think it's a fabulously stupid way to be ("an eye for an
eye and the whole world is blind"). Nobody can force me to
treat them badly and if I do treat someone badly it's
nobody's fault but my own. It's a question of personal
responsibility.
--

EXACTLY

Paulette~

Subject: Can I just attach a Pic?
From: (Melinda Shore)
Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2003 7:42 PM
Message-id:

In article ,
Kind2dogs wrote:
He mostly treated people the same way they treated him, whether they
agreed with him or not.
Yup and NOT A BAD WAY TO BE!

I think it's a fabulously stupid way to be ("an eye for an
eye and the whole world is blind"). Nobody can force me to
treat them badly and if I do treat someone badly it's
nobody's fault but my own. It's a question of personal
responsibility.
--

EXACTLY

Paulette~