A dog & canine forum. DogBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » DogBanter forum » Dog forums » Dog behavior
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 9th 03, 05:35 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael,

Is posting misogynist bullshit
under a female screen name
a known symptom of any
recognized psychiatric
syndrome?

JohnR
Pit Bull Libertarian

Never sneer at the power of a little
pink squeaky toy!
  #2  
Old October 9th 03, 05:35 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael,

Is posting misogynist bullshit
under a female screen name
a known symptom of any
recognized psychiatric
syndrome?

JohnR
Pit Bull Libertarian

Never sneer at the power of a little
pink squeaky toy!
  #3  
Old October 10th 03, 05:18 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003

Jack writes:

Why is this just now getting your
attention, John?


It hasn't. See my previous response
to Michael him/herself.

He's been posting that crap about
the women here since Wesley Clark
was a corporal.


No kidding, eh?

I understand that you are feeling
rattled, having been shown up
as a statistically-challenged,
innumerate boob and all that.
But try to actually read what
you choose to respond to.

Are you dating/engaged/married to Kelly?


Funny you should ask. The answer is
"no", but it's still funny that you ask!

  #4  
Old October 10th 03, 05:18 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jack writes:

Why is this just now getting your
attention, John?


It hasn't. See my previous response
to Michael him/herself.

He's been posting that crap about
the women here since Wesley Clark
was a corporal.


No kidding, eh?

I understand that you are feeling
rattled, having been shown up
as a statistically-challenged,
innumerate boob and all that.
But try to actually read what
you choose to respond to.

Are you dating/engaged/married to Kelly?


Funny you should ask. The answer is
"no", but it's still funny that you ask!

  #5  
Old October 10th 03, 05:18 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jack writes:

Why is this just now getting your
attention, John?


It hasn't. See my previous response
to Michael him/herself.

He's been posting that crap about
the women here since Wesley Clark
was a corporal.


No kidding, eh?

I understand that you are feeling
rattled, having been shown up
as a statistically-challenged,
innumerate boob and all that.
But try to actually read what
you choose to respond to.

Are you dating/engaged/married to Kelly?


Funny you should ask. The answer is
"no", but it's still funny that you ask!

  #6  
Old October 10th 03, 05:23 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Incredibly Stupid Jack Morrison writes:

Whether he's been hanging out here
much lately or not, John is very
aware of Michael's misogynist rants.
I've never seen him take umbrage
over any of them until Michael finally
got around to Kelly.


Look, dingbat. The irony I could not
pass up commenting on was that
Michael was posting under a female
screen name. My post had nothing
to do with the fact that Kelly was
mentioned. There are at least
four women on Michael's list
who I've had good realtions
with far longer than I've even
known Kelly. And although Kelly
and I have met previously
elsewhere on the net, we've
never exactly been buds.

JohnR
Pit Bull Libertarian

Never sneer at the power of a little
pink squeaky toy!
  #7  
Old October 10th 03, 05:23 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Incredibly Stupid Jack Morrison writes:

Whether he's been hanging out here
much lately or not, John is very
aware of Michael's misogynist rants.
I've never seen him take umbrage
over any of them until Michael finally
got around to Kelly.


Look, dingbat. The irony I could not
pass up commenting on was that
Michael was posting under a female
screen name. My post had nothing
to do with the fact that Kelly was
mentioned. There are at least
four women on Michael's list
who I've had good realtions
with far longer than I've even
known Kelly. And although Kelly
and I have met previously
elsewhere on the net, we've
never exactly been buds.

JohnR
Pit Bull Libertarian

Never sneer at the power of a little
pink squeaky toy!
  #8  
Old October 10th 03, 05:23 AM
John F Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Incredibly Stupid Jack Morrison writes:

Whether he's been hanging out here
much lately or not, John is very
aware of Michael's misogynist rants.
I've never seen him take umbrage
over any of them until Michael finally
got around to Kelly.


Look, dingbat. The irony I could not
pass up commenting on was that
Michael was posting under a female
screen name. My post had nothing
to do with the fact that Kelly was
mentioned. There are at least
four women on Michael's list
who I've had good realtions
with far longer than I've even
known Kelly. And although Kelly
and I have met previously
elsewhere on the net, we've
never exactly been buds.

JohnR
Pit Bull Libertarian

Never sneer at the power of a little
pink squeaky toy!
  #9  
Old October 10th 03, 04:15 PM
Sionnach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


My post had nothing
to do with the fact that Kelly was
mentioned.


Nor did it make the slightest mention of Kelly. G

As a point of note, though, it's more likely that "Sara James" is a
permutation of somebody who's posted or e-mailed - don't forget that Mikey
was posting under "Julia Altshuler" a few weeks ago, and has used variations
of other female regulars' names, as well.


  #10  
Old October 10th 03, 04:15 PM
Sionnach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


My post had nothing
to do with the fact that Kelly was
mentioned.


Nor did it make the slightest mention of Kelly. G

As a point of note, though, it's more likely that "Sara James" is a
permutation of somebody who's posted or e-mailed - don't forget that Mikey
was posting under "Julia Altshuler" a few weeks ago, and has used variations
of other female regulars' names, as well.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003 &mi*chae*el Dog health 2 October 9th 03 06:03 AM
RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003 &mi*chae*el Dog rescue 3 October 9th 03 06:03 AM
RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003 &mi*chae*el Dog health 0 October 9th 03 05:49 AM
RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003 &mi*chae*el Dog rescue 0 October 9th 03 05:49 AM
RPD* Crazy Person List Update 10/9/2003 &mi*chae*el Dog rescue 0 October 9th 03 05:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 (Unauthorized Upgrade)
Copyright ©2004-2024 DogBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.